Message-Id: <6.1.2.0.2.20050412174202.030b87c0@mail.jefsey.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 18:03:45 +0200
To: Michael Everson <everson@evertype.com>,
	IETF Languages Discussion <ietf-languages@alvestrand.no>
From: "JFC (Jefsey) Morfin" <jefsey@jefsey.com>
In-Reply-To: <p0611041dbe81973450dc@[4.241.21.175]>
References: <F8ACB1B494D9734783AAB114D0CE68FE059CA34E@RED-MSG-52.redmond.corp.microsof
	t.com> <425B647F.E0729469@xencraft.com>
	<6.1.2.0.2.20050412115517.063b0380@mail.jefsey.com>
	<p06110413be815f2201fb@[4.241.21.175]>
	<6.1.2.0.2.20050412150445.06d16110@mail.jefsey.com>
	<p0611041dbe81973450dc@[4.241.21.175]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: 
Subject: Re: recently-approved tags
Precedence: list
Sender: ietf-languages-bounces@alvestrand.no
Errors-To: ietf-languages-bounces@alvestrand.no

At 17:19 12/04/2005, Michael Everson wrote:
>At 15:36 +0200 2005-04-12, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin wrote:
>
>>Michael, my mail was copied to the AFRAC list. [...]
>>
>>PS. Merci de ne respecter la règle de ne pas copier vos commentaires sur 
>>les listes alvestrand/ietf.
>
>I received your mail on the IETF language tags list and I responded to it 
>there. Perhaps you could just refrain from posting here at all.

I am afraid you have to chose. Either this list is a private list, which 
might justify your suggestion. Either it is a IANA list and your suggestion 
is innapropriate. Or it is an IETF list (but to my knowledge no one ever 
suggested it) and your suggestion is a violation of the IETF rules.

I am sorry to be strict in all this. As explained many times, the disregard 
of formalism is a source of many of the difficulties created/met by this 
list. The status of this list is subject to a Draft under discussion. You 
would be most welcome to join the list where this Draft is discussed.

To my understanding however the present list has never been discussed as 
being an IETF list. However considering the idea, it could be good one: 
this list could be a permanent IETF WG, publishing regular (yearly) updates 
as RFC maintained through regular Drafts. This could actually solve a lot 
of IANA related issues, since the Drafts and RFCs are a very well 
established system.

jfc

_______________________________________________
Ietf-languages mailing list
Ietf-languages@alvestrand.no
http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages