Return-Path: Received: from murder ([unix socket]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Cyrus v2.2.8-Mandrake-RPM-2.2.8-4.2.101mdk) with LMTPA; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 11:19:07 +0200 X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.2 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3678B61B5B for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 11:19:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 04065-01 for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 11:19:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B49261B47 for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 11:19:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DI1FQ-0005aG-K5; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 05:18:24 -0400 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DI1FO-0005a0-Gr for ltru@megatron.ietf.org; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 05:18:22 -0400 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id FAA06957 for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 05:18:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [63.247.76.194] (helo=montage.altserver.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1DI1N5-0007xb-6l for ltru@ietf.org; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 05:26:20 -0400 Received: from lns-p19-1-idf-82-251-95-81.adsl.proxad.net ([82.251.95.81] helo=jfc.afrac.org) by montage.altserver.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.44) id 1DI1FH-0004zR-AF; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 01:18:15 -0800 Message-Id: <6.1.2.0.2.20050403110609.02f41100@mail.jefsey.com> X-Sender: jefsey+jefsey.com@mail.jefsey.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.1.2.0 Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 11:10:05 +0200 To: "Doug Ewell" From: "JFC (Jefsey) Morfin" Subject: Re: [Ltru] Re: is there some wiskey in the jar In-Reply-To: <000c01c5380c$3189bac0$030aa8c0@DEWELL> References: <20050403005618.BJER2135.mta2.adelphia.net@megatron.ietf.org> <000c01c5380c$3189bac0$030aa8c0@DEWELL> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - montage.altserver.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - jefsey.com X-Scan-Signature: 79899194edc4f33a41f49410777972f8 Cc: ltru@ietf.org X-BeenThere: ltru@lists.ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: ltru-bounces@lists.ietf.org Errors-To: ltru-bounces@lists.ietf.org X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at alvestrand.no On 07:15 03/04/2005, Doug Ewell said: >JFC (Jefsey) Morfin wrote: > > > Neither did I. But I also observed that most of the international > > standard blockages and delays result from the need of compromise on > > that very matter. This is why the best way to block the Draft I am > > advised, is to leave it the way it is. > >Does participation in an IETF Working Group with the intent of finding >"the best way to block the Draft" qualify as "disruptive behavior" under >BCP 94? If not, then what would? This permanent twisting starts being a boring disruptive behavior per se. Please reread what I wrote. Or may be, you are precisely referring to your own attitude. In this case I apologize for the misinderstanding. When is the jar going to be ready? I have a meeting on this on Tuesday and would like to show them an example or two of what you produced. jfc _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru@lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru