Return-Path: Received: from murder ([unix socket]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Cyrus v2.2.8-Mandrake-RPM-2.2.8-4.2.101mdk) with LMTPA; Sat, 02 Jul 2005 00:37:43 +0200 X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.2 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5081061B03 for ; Sat, 2 Jul 2005 00:37:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 28449-09 for ; Sat, 2 Jul 2005 00:37:41 +0200 (CEST) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.4.8 Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id B468461AFD for ; Sat, 2 Jul 2005 00:37:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DoU74-00049M-LG; Fri, 01 Jul 2005 18:35:58 -0400 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DoU72-00049H-IN for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2005 18:35:56 -0400 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA02132 for ; Fri, 1 Jul 2005 18:35:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from montage.altserver.com ([63.247.74.122]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1DoUX5-0006fw-Dh for ietf@ietf.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2005 19:02:51 -0400 Received: from ver78-2-82-241-91-24.fbx.proxad.net ([82.241.91.24] helo=jfc.afrac.org) by montage.altserver.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.44) id 1DoU6O-0000Vq-Qm; Fri, 01 Jul 2005 15:35:17 -0700 Message-Id: <6.2.1.2.2.20050701230622.03f2dbf0@mail.jefsey.com> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.1.2 Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2005 23:07:47 +0200 To: "Theodore Ts'o" , Ken Carlberg From: "JFC (Jefsey) Morfin" In-Reply-To: <20050701145159.GB2719@thunk.org> References: <200507010501.BAA14078@ietf.org> <20050701145159.GB2719@thunk.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - montage.altserver.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - jefsey.com X-Scan-Signature: 93238566e09e6e262849b4f805833007 Cc: ietf@ietf.org Subject: Re: S stands for Steering [Re: Should the IESG rule or not?] X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF-Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at alvestrand.no The list of "satisfied" is of ne real interest. The list of "disatistied" seem important enough to say there is no consensus. At 16:51 01/07/2005, Theodore Ts'o wrote: >On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 01:02:29AM -0400, Ken Carlberg wrote: > > My view is that your impression of the reaction is incorrect. in > > taking the position that respondents can be classified as either: > > a) being satisfied with the IESG *decision*, b) dissatisfied or > > uncomfortable with the decision, or c) could not be clearly > > determined by the content of their response, I came up with the > > following list. > >You can add me into the "Satisified" column". Note that sampling >messages posted to ietf@ietf.org on this list will almost certainly be >biased, since it is the people who are disasstified which are likely >going to be the ones complaining aobut it. > > - Ted > >_______________________________________________ >Ietf mailing list >Ietf@ietf.org >https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf