Message-Id: <6.2.1.2.2.20050623001650.043712e0@mail.afrac.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 04:23:52 +0200
To: "Peter Constable" <petercon@microsoft.com>, <ltru@ietf.org>
From: r&d afrac <rd@afrac.org>
Subject: RE: [Ltru] QED
In-Reply-To: <F8ACB1B494D9734783AAB114D0CE68FE0654EDFA@RED-MSG-52.redmon
	d.corp.microsoft.com>
References: <F8ACB1B494D9734783AAB114D0CE68FE0654EDFA@RED-MSG-52.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Cc: 
Precedence: list
Sender: ltru-bounces@lists.ietf.org
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@lists.ietf.org

At 17:51 22/06/2005, Peter Constable wrote:
>*This* post to LTRU is a troll. I'll respond only because I think the 
>relative newcomer, F. Charles, should be given a chance to hear more than 
>Jefsey's evaluation of the members of this list.

Hi! Peter,
I am afraid you are trolling yourself this time. We are just transparent.

That exchange was not what led to Addison's reference to trolls,
>however. It was this thread related to Jefsey's suggestion that a
>re-evaluation of the charter for this group is necessary.

??? We only wait for a common reading of the Charter and of its thorny 
points, as announced by Randy. We do not think the Draft concepts follow 
the Charter. The recent responses over x-tags show it.

>As a result of his repeated behaviour on this list -- useful contributions 
>on a few occasions, but far more often impractical suggestions, 
>obstruction or insult ...

I do not really care as I have no dispute with you (except when you talk of 
"end users") but can you please quote the URL of this "insult" ?

All the best.
jfc

PS. All of you who happen to be in Paris send me a mail. BTW work for ISOC 
France to host a nice evening (should be on Aug. 4th).  


_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru