Return-Path: Received: from murder ([unix socket]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Cyrus v2.2.8-Mandrake-RPM-2.2.8-4.2.101mdk) with LMTPA; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 03:01:50 +0200 X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.2 Received: from localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3F4F32009A for ; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 03:01:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 16383-04 for ; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 03:01:47 +0200 (CEST) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.4.8 Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id D542D320099 for ; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 03:01:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1E4pkl-0004kW-Gd; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 20:56:31 -0400 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1E4pkj-0004kD-RV for ltru@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 20:56:29 -0400 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA17103 for ; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 20:56:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from montage.altserver.com ([63.247.74.122]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E4qJy-0001G8-GQ for ltru@ietf.org; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 21:32:54 -0400 Received: from ver78-2-82-241-91-24.fbx.proxad.net ([82.241.91.24] helo=jfc.afrac.org) by montage.altserver.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.44) id 1E4pke-0006bm-OI; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 17:56:25 -0700 Message-Id: <6.2.1.2.2.20050816011043.03bc8910@mail.afrac.org> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.1.2 Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 01:22:19 +0200 To: "Addison Phillips" , "Peter Constable" , "LTRU Working Group" From: r&d afrac Subject: RE: [Ltru] [psg.com #1096] "nb" versus "no" In-Reply-To: <634978A7DF025A40BFEF33EB191E13BC0C72BAC9@irvmbxw01.quest.c om> References: <634978A7DF025A40BFEF33EB191E13BC0C72BAC9@irvmbxw01.quest.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - montage.altserver.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - afrac.org X-Scan-Signature: 79899194edc4f33a41f49410777972f8 Cc: X-BeenThere: ltru@lists.ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: ltru-bounces@lists.ietf.org Errors-To: ltru-bounces@lists.ietf.org X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at alvestrand.no At 00:39 16/08/2005, Addison Phillips wrote: >... in RFC 3066ter. By 3066 AD? So interested in restricting the 3066 ABNF that you cannot think how to support this without needing another RFC ... Why not just to foresee it now (at three years at least the Draft)? I do not see your problem? Obviously I am biaised: I want to favor the best interests of the users. There is an obvious COI. Take care. jfc _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru@lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru