Message-Id: <6.2.1.2.2.20050814152250.04080180@mail.afrac.org>
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 16:03:58 +0200
To: "Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>, ltru@ietf.org
From: r&d afrac <rd@afrac.org>
Subject: Re: [Ltru] Wrapping up the second WG last calls on the
	registry and initial registry drafts
In-Reply-To: <008101c59fca$b6729560$7f1afea9@oemcomputer>
References: <008101c59fca$b6729560$7f1afea9@oemcomputer>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Cc: 
Precedence: list
Sender: ltru-bounces@lists.ietf.org
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@lists.ietf.org

On 07:49 13/08/2005, Randy Presuhn said:
>  Then Martin and I will start the process of shepherding these through 
> the IESG, using the
>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-proto-wgchair-doc-shepherding-05.txt 
>procedures as directed by our AD.

Interesting. FYI:

1) I have a pending proposition to the authors of this draft to make every 
Sheperding WG Chair work copied to the WG, including the separate mails 
reporting on formal oppositions, as a LC not subject to consensus, for 
transparency and editing assistance (this is the WG sales pitch).

2) I have also proposed two additional questions (the Charter which is the 
Contact with the IESG/IAB is not considered, COI and chapel and status quo 
effects are only partly addressed):

     - has the WG initially well understood its Charter? Has it adhered to 
it? Has it extended it in some manner? Has the WG used a working road map 
of some sort?  Does the presented document fulfills the corresponding 
part(s) of the WG Charter? Has the WG identified relations with the Charter 
of other WGs? In such a case have you discussed the matter with the 
concerned ADs and WG Chairs?

    - do you feel comfortable that this document is free from competition 
between technical chapels and represents a genuine, inclusive and open 
effort to best support all the needs of the state of the art protocols, 
applications, procedures, of the current or of the documented common 
practices, and of the disclosed R&D projects?

jfc




_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru