Message-Id: <6.2.1.2.2.20050807210207.056573e0@mail.afrac.org>
Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 21:57:04 +0200
To: "L.Gillam" <L.Gillam@surrey.ac.uk>, ltru <ltru@ietf.org>
From: r&d afrac <rd@afrac.org>
Subject: RE: [Ltru] W3C tag policy disclaimers and IETF RFCs
In-Reply-To: <4A7C6FA2AB31194E80E13FE585F6A2121A59D5@EVS-EC1-NODE1.surre
	y.ac.uk>
References: <4A7C6FA2AB31194E80E13FE585F6A2121A59D5@EVS-EC1-NODE1.surrey.ac.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Cc: 
Precedence: list
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2074000219=="
Sender: ltru-bounces@lists.ietf.org
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@lists.ietf.org

--===============2074000219==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="=====================_35286369==.ALT"

--=====================_35286369==.ALT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed

At 18:17 07/08/2005, L.Gillam wrote:
>Jefsey, are you deliberately attempting to misrepresent my position again?

Dear Lee,
??? I do not represent any position of yours?

I just say that your point was well made. AFRAC discussed it and thought 
the best idea was to leave "x-" to your ideas (even if I do not think they 
match our needs: this is your ideas and you have the right to get them 
supported - up to you to document and support them). They also thought that 
the "0- escape sequence" is the best way to support our needs and to best 
respect the Draft ABNF (for "basic" libraries, it only means that all what 
is after "0-" is disregarded).

But I do not think your proposition support the Kindberg/Hawke RFC.

>And doing so even after I described to you privately how to make use of x- 
>for your own needs, which you have neither acknowledged nor refuted.

I have responded and fully documented that you did not. Or you responded a 
mail I did not receive (or which was filtered out by my anti-spam). What is 
the date-time of your last mail?

>And, above all, spelling my name incorrectly.

I apologies for that typo. No harm intended.

>Do you seek to annoy people in as many ways as possible?

It is rather a hobby to protect the human and cultural interests of as many 
people as possible against the annoyments artificially created by  others. 
But first, it is a defense against a few people wanting to annoy our work 
as much as they can.

>  Is it a hobby?

Oh! no.... unfortunately just a necessity they impose on us. Also a 
response to a demand of people, civil rights, industry and Govs, from 
developed and developing countries to help protecting their culture. An 
ethical duty.

jfc

--=====================_35286369==.ALT
Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"

<html>
<body>
At 18:17 07/08/2005, L.Gillam wrote:<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite=""><font face="arial" size=2>
Jefsey, are you deliberately attempting to misrepresent my position
again?</font></blockquote><br>
Dear Lee,<br>
??? I do not represent any position of yours?<br><br>
I just say that your point was well made. AFRAC discussed it and thought
the best idea was to leave &quot;x-&quot; to your ideas (even if I do not
think they match our needs: this is your ideas and you have the right to
get them supported - up to you to document and support them). They also
thought that the &quot;0- escape sequence&quot; is the best way to
support our needs and to best respect the Draft ABNF (for
&quot;basic&quot; libraries, it only means that all what is after
&quot;0-&quot; is disregarded).<br><br>
But I do not think your proposition support the Kindberg/Hawke
RFC.<br><br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite=""><font face="arial" size=2>And
doing so even after I described to you privately how to make use of x-
for your own needs, which you have neither acknowledged nor refuted.
</font></blockquote><br>
I have responded and fully documented that you did not. Or you responded
a mail I did not receive (or which was filtered out by my anti-spam).
What is the date-time of your last mail?<br><br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite=""><font face="arial" size=2>And,
above all, spelling my name incorrectly.</font></blockquote><br>
I apologies for that typo. No harm intended.<br><br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite=""><font face="arial" size=2>Do you
seek to annoy people in as many ways as
possible?</font></blockquote><br>
It is rather a hobby to protect the human and cultural interests of as
many people as possible against the annoyments artificially created
by&nbsp; others. But first, it is a defense against a few people wanting
to annoy our work as much as they can. <br><br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite=""><font face="arial" size=2>
&nbsp;Is it a hobby?</font></blockquote><br>
Oh! no.... unfortunately just a necessity they impose on us. Also a
response to a demand of people, civil rights, industry and Govs, from
developed and developing countries to help protecting their culture. An
ethical duty.<br><br>
jfc<br>
</body>
</html>

--=====================_35286369==.ALT--



--===============2074000219==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru

--===============2074000219==--