Message-Id: <6.2.1.2.2.20050802145056.03b7a260@mail.afrac.org>
Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2005 14:59:03 +0200
To: Randy Presuhn <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>, ltru@ietf.org
From: r&d afrac <rd@afrac.org>
Subject: Re: [Ltru] Re: issue #1072 Last Call text alternative over
	languages and Internet
In-Reply-To: <24732742.1122985287341.JavaMail.root@wamui-billy.atl.sa.ea
	rthlink.net>
References: <24732742.1122985287341.JavaMail.root@wamui-billy.atl.sa.earthlink.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Cc: 
Precedence: list
Sender: ltru-bounces@lists.ietf.org
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@lists.ietf.org

At 14:21 02/08/2005, Randy Presuhn wrote:
>Hi -
>
>As a technical contributor, I find both of the changes Jefsey suggests highly
>objectionable.  I strongly prefer that make neither of the changes he proposes
>below.  (A) would clearly contravene syntactic compatibility, and is thus
>not acceptable.  (B) makes claims about applicability ("final language
>tagging system for the whole Internet") that are patently false.

Dear Randy,
This is patently untrue. The Draft wants to replace RFC 3066 as BCP 47 and 
as such established a final language tagging system for the whole Internet. 
This is the whole point of the debate for eight months now, and the reason 
why the Draft failed the Last Call.

If you truly believe I am wrong (but then many others are wrong):
1. you simply have to have this confirmed by the IESG and IAB or use my 
text in replacing "wants" by "does not want".
2. I will introduce an RFC for information on the use of "0-".

jfc

BTW. I love all the confusion you introduced to quickly close the Last 
Call. Not even leaving Addison the time to oppose. :-) However, with this 
mail you acknowledged my proposed text before the end of the Last Call. And 
did not registered it! I also love that you register a Last Call text two 
days late, to close immediately it because you as a private contributor 
said you oppose :-) :).

This was supposed to be the IETF ....






_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru