Document: draft-snell-atompub-bidi-06.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 2008-04-22
IETF LC End Date: 2008-05-09
IESG Telechat date: unknown

Summary: Ready

Comments: one comment and two questions, all are editorial so have to be handled by the RFC Editor:
 - in ToC (page 2) and Appendix (page 6): Acknowledgements -> Acknowledgments
 - some refs are pretty long (for instance [W3C.REC-xml-names-19990114]),
  I'd like to get opinions about this as there are pros and cons.
 - Acknowledgments are in an appendix, usually it is a section.