Document: draft-ietf-seamoby-iana-02
Reviewer: Spencer Dawkins
Date: June 20, 2004

"A reasonable contribution" - in fact, required by Seamoby's other
protocol specifications.

The usual 2026 boilerplate comment applies.

"has initially designed" doesn't seem to be the right grammar, in the
abstract.

I'm surprised "AVP" isn't expanded in the 5.1 title (and more
surprised it's not expanded in the suggested name for the registry).

The "IETF Concensus Action" at the end of 2.0 doesn't point to RFC
2434, although parallel sentences (for instance, the end of 5.1 says
"Expert Review, as defined in RFC 2434"). I'd like to see the pointer
at the end of 2.0, too.

5.2 - Given that the registry is starting with 8 values, and this is
just from IEEE 802, I'm wondering if one byte (255 values) leaves
enough headroom for the next 20 years. I guess it's BARELY big enough.
Yeah, Seamoby is Experimental, but what if the experiment works?

Thanks,

Spencer