Document: draft-ietf-imapext-sort-19.txt
Reviewer: Spencer Dawkins
Review Date: 2008-02-28
IETF LC End Date: 2008-03-04
IESG Telechat date: 2008-03-27

Summary: This document is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard

Comments: Mark Allman said "ready for publication as a proposed standard" in 
March 2004, reviewing -14. I saw nothing in the diffs between -14 and -19 
to change this opinion from a generalist point of view.

I did see the current last call discussion on the IETF mailing list, but agree 
with Pete Resnick that the ship has sailed on basic functionality for publication 
as a Proposed Standard.

I didn't say "this draft has suffered enough" as my summary, but I thought about it. 




=========================================================================================




Document: draft-ietf-imapext-sort-14
Reviewer: Mark Allman
Date: March 17,2004

I think this draft is ready for publication as a proposed standard.  The
draft is fairly clear and complete, I think.  If it is to be tweaked
again I have only a couple small nits that could be addressed - even in
auth48, I think):

  * In section 2.1 a forward reference to the ABNF presented in section
    5 would be nice.

  * 2.1: "[IMAP-MODEL]" --> "[IMAP-MODEL])"

  * At the very end of 2.2 a reference to "SEARCH" would be useful.

  * BASE.6.4.SORT: The draft notes that UID SORT is to SORT what UID
    SEARCH is to SEARCH.  But, this makes zero sense to me.  A couple
    line sketch of this relationship would be helpful, I think.

None of these are big deals.  I would not hold up the draft on them,
clearly.