Document: draft-ietf-capwap-problem-statement-01.txt
Reviewer: John Loughney
Date: 18 August 2004

Summary:

I would put a discuss, based upon my comment #3 - security  
considerations
section.

Comments:

1) Abstract is a bit thin, I would suggest a little more detail here.
2) Section 2 is the main problem.  I actually think that the work
    should be done, but I have to say that section 2 did not convince
    me that the work should be done.  However, I am also of the opinion
    that Problem Statement documents should be short and to the point.
    I am not sure if it is worthwhile to spend 3 more months improving
    this section
3) My biggest issue is with the security considerations.  Shouldn't this
    section discuss possible threats cause by the lack of a solution, and
    also a short discussion on what new threats could be created?  One of
    the downsides to centralization is the ability for someone to gain
    control of a large number of devices.  If the central control entity
    is compromized, your in big trouble.

NITS

1) Standard 3667-3668 text needs inserting
2) I didn't run the ID-NITs script, nor did I do a reference check.