Document: draft-ietf-aaa-eap-09.txt
Review: Mark Allman
Date: 	27 oktober 2004 


This one looks ready.  (From a non-expert.)

Per usual, I think it could have done a bit better job of sketching the
problem being solved.  But, it's OK.  If the doc does get rev-ed, I'd
suggest:

  * better problem description (nothing huge, but give non-experts a
    general feel)

  * spell out AVP and NASREQ the first time you use them (and, tell me
    what they are!)

  * reference PAP/CHAP