Document: draft-iesg-sponsoring-guidelines-01
Reviewer: David L. Black
Review Date: February 14, 2007
IETF LC End Date: February 21, 2007

Summary:

This draft is ready for publication as an Informational RFC

Comments:

Should this be a BCP (Best Current Practice) document?

I saw a few editorial nits that the RFC editor will correct.
idnits 2.02.1 didn't find anything to complain about.

Section 5 says:

   If it
   is likely that the document would generate a 3, 4 or 5
   response based on RFC 3932 it is not appropriate for an
   independent submission.

While RFC 3932 should remain the authoritative specification
of the responses, a summary of the nature of the responses
(3=harmful to IETF work, 4=violates IETF procedures,
5=extends an IETF protocol without IETF approval) would be
useful here.