Gen-Art Review Assignments for June 6, 2008

Good approximation of what will be included in the Agenda of next Telechat (2008-06-05).



2. Protocol Actions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet
infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"
         

2.1 WG Submissions

          2.1.1 New Item
      AreaDate
RTGTraffic Engineering Extensions to OSPF version 3 (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 12
draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-traffic-11.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Token: David Ward
  Reviewer:Vijay Gurbani (already reviewed for LC)
    
RTGTwo-Document ballot: [Open Web Ballot] - 2 of 12
Outbound Route Filtering Capability for BGP-4 (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 12
draft-ietf-idr-route-filter-16.txt
  Reviewer: Joel Halpern (already reviewed for LC)
     
Address Prefix Based Outbound Route Filter for BGP-4 (Proposed Standard)
draft-ietf-idr-bgp-prefix-orf-04.txt
Token: David Ward
  Reviewer:Joel Halpern (already reviewed for LC)
    
RTGFormat for using TLVs in PIM messages (Proposed Standard) - 3 of 12
draft-ietf-pim-join-attributes-03.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Token: David Ward
  Reviewer:Elwyn Davies (already reviewed for LC)
    
SECTextual Conventions for Syslog Management (Proposed Standard) - 4 of 12
draft-ietf-syslog-tc-mib-08.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Token: Pasi Eronen
  Reviewer:Brian Carpenter (reviewed -07 for LC)
    
GENTwo-Document ballot: [Open Web Ballot] - 5 of 12
Rights Contributors provide to the IETF Trust (BCP) - 5 of 12
draft-ietf-ipr-3978-incoming-09.txt
Advice to the Trustees of the IETF Trust on Rights to be Granted in IETF Documents (Informational)
draft-ietf-ipr-outbound-rights-06.txt
Token: Russ Housley
RTGBasic Specification for IP Fast-Reroute: Loop-free Alternates (Proposed Standard) - 6 of 12
draft-ietf-rtgwg-ipfrr-spec-base-12.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Token: David Ward
  Reviewer:Scott Brim (already reviewed for LC)
    
RTGBidirectional Forwarding Detection (Proposed Standard) - 7 of 12
draft-ietf-bfd-base-08.txt
Token: Ross Callon
  Reviewer:Spencer Dawkins (already reviewed for LC)
    
RTGBFD for Multihop Paths (Proposed Standard) - 8 of 12
draft-ietf-bfd-multihop-06.txt
Token: Ross Callon
  Reviewer:Francis Dupont
    
RTGBFD for IPv4 and IPv6 (Single Hop) (Proposed Standard) - 9 of 12
draft-ietf-bfd-v4v6-1hop-08.txt
Token: Ross Callon
  Reviewer:Christian Vogt (assigned LC)
    
RTGGeneric Application of BFD (Proposed Standard) - 10 of 12
draft-ietf-bfd-generic-04.txt
Token: Ross Callon
  Reviewer:Vijay Gurbani (already reviewed for LC)
    
RTGBFD For MPLS LSPs (Proposed Standard) - 11 of 12
draft-ietf-bfd-mpls-05.txt
Token: Ross Callon
  Reviewer:Brian Carpenter (already reviewed for LC)
    
TSVResource ReSerVation Protovol (RSVP) Extensions for Emergency Services (Proposed Standard) - 12 of 12
draft-ietf-tsvwg-emergency-rsvp-08.txt [Open Web Ballot]
  Token: Magnus Westerlund
  Reviewer: Joel Halpern (already reviewed)
   
2.1.2 Returning Item
      NONE

2.2 Individual Submissions

          2.2.1 New Item
      AreaDate
APPContexts for IMAP4 (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 1
draft-cridland-imap-context-05.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Note: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> is the document shepherd
  Token: Chris Newman
  Reviewer: Miguel Garcia (reviewed -03 for LC - deemed ready)
   
2.2.2 Returning Item
      NONE

3. Document Actions

         

3.1 WG Submissions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable
contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If
not, what changes would make it so?"
          3.1.1 New Item
      AreaDate
RTGHost Threats to Protocol Independent Multicast (PIM) (Informational) - 1 of 2
draft-ietf-pim-lasthop-threats-04.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Token: David Ward
  Reviewer:Eric Gray (reviewed -03 for LC)
    
SECECC Support for PKINIT (Informational) - 2 of 2
draft-zhu-pkinit-ecc-04.txt [Open Web Ballot]
  Token: Tim Polk
  Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan
   
3.1.2 Returning Item
      NONE

3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable
contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If
not, what changes would make it so?"
          3.2.1 New Item
      AreaDate
APPAtom Bidirectional Attribute (Experimental) - 1 of 2
draft-snell-atompub-bidi-06.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Token: Lisa Dusseault
  Reviewer:Francis Dupont (already reviewed)
    
GENA Uniform Resource Name (URN) Namespace for the 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) (Informational) - 2 of 2
draft-monrad-sipping-3gpp-urn-namespace-02.txt [Open Web Ballot]
  Token: Lisa Dusseault
  Reviewer: Joel Halpern (reviewed -01)
   
3.2.2 Returning Item
      NONE

3.3 Independent Submissions Via RFC Editor

The IESG will use RFC 3932 responses: 1) The IESG has not
found any conflict between this document and IETF work; 2) The
IESG thinks that this work is related to IETF work done in WG
<X>, but this does not prevent publishing; 3) The IESG thinks
that publication is harmful to work in WG <X> and recommends
not publishing at this time; 4) The IESG thinks that this
document violates the IETF procedures for <X> and should
therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG
approval; 5) The IESG thinks that this document extends an
IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should
therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval.

The document shepherd must propose one of these responses in
the Data Tracker note and supply complete text in the IESG
Note portion of the write-up. The Area Director ballot positions
indicate consensus with the response proposed by the
document shepherd.

Other matters may be recorded in comments, and the comments will
be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the document.
          3.3.1 New Item
      NONE
3.3.2 Returning Item
      NONE