Gen-ART Review Assignments - 06 March 2008

Good approximation of what will be included in the Agenda of next Telechat (2008-03-06).

2. Protocol Actions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet
infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"

2.1 WG Submissions

2.1.1 New Item

Area	Date
APP		Internet Message Access Protocol Internationalization (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 7
		draft-ietf-imapext-i18n-15.txt [Open Web Ballot]
	Token:	Lisa Dusseault
	Reviewer:	Ben Campbell (reviewed -14 for LC)

RAI		A Document Format for Requesting Consent (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 7
		draft-ietf-sipping-consent-format-06.txt [Open Web Ballot]
	Token:	Jon Peterson
	Reviewer:	Christian Vogt (assigned -05 for LC)

RAI		The Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Pending Additions Event Package (Proposed Standard) - 3 of 7
		draft-ietf-sipping-pending-additions-04.txt [Open Web Ballot]
	Token:	Jon Peterson
	Reviewer:	David Black (reviewed -03 for LC)

RAI		Session Initiation Protocol Service Examples (BCP) - 4 of 7
		draft-ietf-sipping-service-examples-14.txt [Open Web Ballot]
	Token:	Jon Peterson
	Reviewer:	Brian Carpenter (reviewed -13 for LC)

RAI		LoST: A Location-to-Service Translation Protocol (Proposed Standard) - 5 of 7
		draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-07.txt [Open Web Ballot]
	Token:	Jon Peterson
	Reviewer:	Ben Campbell (reviewed -06 for LC)

OPS		NETCONF Event Notifications (Proposed Standard) - 6 of 7
		draft-ietf-netconf-notification-12.txt [Open Web Ballot]
	Token:	Dan Romascanu
	Reviewer:	Suresh Krishnan (reviewed -11 for LC)

SEC		The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.2 (Proposed Standard) - 7 of 7
		draft-ietf-tls-rfc4346-bis-09.txt [Open Web Ballot]
	Token:	Tim Polk
	Reviewer:	Miguel Garcia (already reviewed for LC)

2.1.2 Returning Item

Area	Date
SEC		Multicast Extensions to the Security Architecture for the Internet Protocol (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 2
		draft-ietf-msec-ipsec-extensions-08.txt [Open Web Ballot]
		Note: Lakshminath Dondeti is the proto shepherd.
	Token:	Tim Polk
	Reviewer:	Miguel Garcia (reviewed -07 for 10 Jan)

INT		Proxy Mobile IPv6 (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 2
		draft-ietf-netlmm-proxymip6-11.txt [Open Web Ballot]
		Note: Document Shepherd is Jonne Soininen
	Token:	Jari Arkko
	Reviewer:	Elwyn Davies (reviewed -10 for 21 Feb)

2.2 Individual Submissions

2.2.1 New Item

Area	Date
OPS		A Template for Documents Containing a MIB Module (BCP) - 1 of 2
		draft-harrington-text-mib-doc-template-04.txt [Open Web Ballot]
	Token:	Dan Romascanu
	Reviewer:	Brian Carpenter (already reviewed)

GEN		Two-Document ballot: - 2 of 2
		Real-time Inter-network Defense (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 2
		draft-moriarty-post-inch-rid-05.txt
	Reviewer:	Brian Carpenter (reviewed -02 for LC)

		IODEF/RID over SOAP (Proposed Standard)
		draft-moriarty-post-inch-rid-soap-05.txt
	Token:	Tim Polk
	Reviewer:	Ben Campbell (reviewed -03 for LC)

2.2.2 Returning Item
NONE

3. Document Actions

3.1 WG Submissions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable
contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If
not, what changes would make it so?"

3.1.1 New Item

Area	Date
SEC	Aug 1	On the applicability of various MIKEY modes and extensions (Informational) - 1 of 2
		draft-ietf-msec-mikey-applicability-08.txt
		Note: Document Shepherd is Lakshminath Dondeti, ldondeti@qualcomm.com
	Token:	Tim Polk
	Reviewer:	Vijay Gurbani (reviewed -07 for LC)

RAI		Media Server Control Protocol Requirements (Informational) - 2 of 2
		draft-ietf-mediactrl-requirements-04.txt [Open Web Ballot]
	Token:	Jon Peterson
	Reviewer:	Scott Brim (reviewed -03 for LC)

3.1.2 Returning Item
NONE

3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable
contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If
not, what changes would make it so?"

3.2.1 New Item

Area	Date
RAI		XML Schema for Media Control (Informational) - 1 of 1
		draft-levin-mmusic-xml-media-control-13.txt [Open Web Ballot]
	Token:	Cullen Jennings
	Reviewer:	Gonzalo Camarillo (reviewed -11 for LC)

3.2.2 Returning Item
NONE

3.3 Independent Submissions Via RFC Editor

The IESG will use RFC 3932 responses: 1) The IESG has not
found any conflict between this document and IETF work; 2) The
IESG thinks that this work is related to IETF work done in WG
<X>, but this does not prevent publishing; 3) The IESG thinks
that publication is harmful to work in WG <X> and recommends
not publishing at this time; 4) The IESG thinks that this
document violates the IETF procedures for <X> and should
therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG
approval; 5) The IESG thinks that this document extends an
IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should
therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval.

The document shepherd must propose one of these responses in
the Data Tracker note and supply complete text in the IESG
Note portion of the write-up. The Area Director ballot positions
indicate consensus with the response proposed by the
document shepherd.

Other matters may be recorded in comments, and the comments will
be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the document.

3.3.1 New Item
NONE
3.3.2 Returning Item
NONE