Gen-Art Review Assignments for 10 Jan 2008

Good approximation of what will be included in the Agenda of next Telechat (2008-01-10).


2. Protocol Actions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet
infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"
         

2.1 WG Submissions

          2.1.1 New Item
    
      AreaDate
OPS Sampling and Filtering Techniques for IP Packet Selection (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 10
draft-ietf-psamp-sample-tech-10.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Token: Dan Romascanu
   Reviewer:Vijay Gurbani (already reviewed for LC)
     
RAI A Telephone Number Mapping (ENUM) Service Registration for Internet Calendaring Services (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 10
draft-ietf-enum-calendar-service-03.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Token: Jon Peterson
   Reviewer:David Black (already reviewed for LC)
     
INT Failure Detection and Locator Pair Exploration Protocol for IPv6 Multihoming (Proposed Standard) - 3 of 10
draft-ietf-shim6-failure-detection-09.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Note: Please also read draft-ietf-shim6-applicability
Mark is handling this for Jari as he is an author
Token: Mark Townsley
   Reviewer:Eric Gray (already reviewed for LC, 12/20)
     
INT Shim6: Level 3 Multihoming Shim Protocol for IPv6 (Proposed Standard) - 4 of 10
draft-ietf-shim6-proto-09.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Note: Please also read draft-ietf-shim6-applicability
Document Shepherd is Geoff Huston <gih@apnic.net>
Token: Jari Arkko
   Reviewer:Vijay Gurbani  (already reviewed for LC, 12/20)
     
APP Sieve Email Filtering: Body Extension (Proposed Standard) - 5 of 10
draft-ietf-sieve-body-07.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Token: Lisa Dusseault
   Reviewer:Elwyn Davies (reviewed -06 for LC)
     
SEC Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate and Certificate Revocation List (CRL) Profile (Proposed Standard) - 6 of 10
draft-ietf-pkix-rfc3280bis-10.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Token: Sam Hartman
   Reviewer:None (Russ is author)
     
OPS Packet Sampling (PSAMP) Protocol Specifications (Proposed Standard) - 7 of 10
draft-ietf-psamp-protocol-09.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Token: Dan Romascanu
   Reviewer:Suresh Krishnan (reviewed -08 for LC)
     
SEC The EAP TLS Authentication Protocol (Proposed Standard) - 8 of 10
draft-simon-emu-rfc2716bis-12.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Note: Joe Salowey  is the proto shepherd
Token: Sam Hartman
   Reviewer:Francis Dupont
     
SEC Multicast Extensions to the Security Architecture for the Internet Protocol (Proposed Standard) - 9 of 10
draft-ietf-msec-ipsec-extensions-07.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Note: Lakshminath Dondeti is the proto shepherd.
Token: Tim Polk
   Reviewer:Miguel Garcia (already reviewed for LC, 12/20)
     
RAI A Framework for Consent-based Communications in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) (Proposed Standard) - 10 of 10
draft-ietf-sip-consent-framework-03.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Note: Keith Drage is the document shepherd
  Token: Cullen Jennings
  Reviewer: Vijay Gurbani (already reviewed for 12/20)
   
2.1.2 Returning Item
      NONE

2.2 Individual Submissions

          2.2.1 New Item
      AreaDate
INTIANA Allocation Guidelines for the Protocol Field (BCP) - 1 of 1
draft-arkko-rfc2780-proto-update-01.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Token: Russ Housley
2.2.2 Returning Item
      NONE

3. Document Actions

         

3.1 WG Submissions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable
contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If
not, what changes would make it so?"
          3.1.1 New Item
      AreaDate
SECProblem and Applicability Statement for Better Than Nothing Security (BTNS) (Informational) - 1 of 3
draft-ietf-btns-prob-and-applic-06.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Token: Sam Hartman
  Reviewer:Ben Campbell (assigned LC due on 1/09/2008)
    
OPSIPv6 Deployment Scenarios in 802.16 Networks (Informational) - 2 of 3
draft-ietf-v6ops-802-16-deployment-scenarios-06.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Token: Ron Bonica
  Reviewer:Brian Carpenter
    
SECNetwork Endpoint Assessment (NEA): Overview and Requirements (Informational) - 3 of 3
draft-ietf-nea-requirements-05.txt [Open Web Ballot]
  Token: Tim Polk
  Reviewer: Scott Brim (already reviewed for LC)
   
3.1.2 Returning Item
      NONE

3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable
contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If
not, what changes would make it so?"
          3.2.1 New Item
      NONE
3.2.2 Returning Item
      AreaDate
GEN A Uniform Resource Name (URN) Namespace for the Digital Video Broadcasting Project (DVB) (Informational) - 1 of 1
draft-adolf-dvb-urn-03.txt [Open Web Ballot]
  Token: Lisa Dusseault
Reviewer: Miguel Garcia (reviewed -00 for LC)

3.3 Independent Submissions Via RFC Editor

The IESG will use RFC 3932 responses: 1) The IESG has not
found any conflict between this document and IETF work; 2) The
IESG thinks that this work is related to IETF work done in WG
<X>, but this does not prevent publishing; 3) The IESG thinks
that publication is harmful to work in WG <X> and recommends
not publishing at this time; 4) The IESG thinks that this
document violates the IETF procedures for <X> and should
therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG
approval; 5) The IESG thinks that this document extends an
IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should
therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval.

The document shepherd must propose one of these responses in
the Data Tracker note and supply complete text in the IESG
Note portion of the write-up. The Area Director ballot positions
indicate consensus with the response proposed by the
document shepherd.

Other matters may be recorded in comments, and the comments will
be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the document.
          3.3.1 New Item
      NONE
3.3.2 Returning Item
      NONE