GenART Review Assignment for 20 July 2006

Good approximation of what will be included in the Agenda of next Telechat (2006-07-20).

Updated 22:2:21 EDT, July 13, 2006


2. Protocol Actions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet
infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"
         

2.1 WG Submissions

          2.1.1 New Item
      AreaDate
SEC The Internet IP Security PKI Profile of IKEv1/ISAKMP, IKEv2, and PKIX (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 2
draft-ietf-pki4ipsec-ikecert-profile-10.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Token: Russ Housley
   Reviewer:Gonzalo Camarillo (already reviewed for LC)
     
RAI RTP payload format for the G.729.1 audio codec (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 2
draft-ietf-avt-rtp-g729-scal-wb-ext-06.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Note: PROTO Shepherd is Colin Perkins csp@csperkins.org
  Token: Cullen Jennings
  Reviewer: Sharon Chisholm (already reviewed for LC)
   
2.1.2 Returning Item
      NONE

2.2 Individual Submissions

          2.2.1 New Item
      NONE
2.2.2 Returning Item
      AreaDate
SEC RIPv2 Cryptographic Authentication (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 1
draft-rja-ripv2-auth-05.txt [Open Web Ballot]
  Token: Russ Housley
  Reviewer: Spencer Dawkins (reviewed -04 for 27 April - deemed Ready)
   

3. Document Actions

         

3.1 WG Submissions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable
contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If
not, what changes would make it so?"
          3.1.1 New Item
      AreaDate
INT Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR) (Informational) - 1 of 2
draft-ietf-dnsext-mdns-46.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Token: Mark Townsley
   Reviewer:Francis Dupont (already reviewed for 6 July)
     
SEC Analysis of Threats Motivating DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) (Informational) - 2 of 2
draft-ietf-dkim-threats-03.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Note: PROTO Shepherd: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
  Token: Russ Housley
  Reviewer: Harald Alvestrand
   
3.1.2 Returning Item
      NONE

3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable
contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If
not, what changes would make it so?"
          3.2.1 New Item
      AreaDate
RTG Two-Document ballot: - 1 of 4
Distance Vector Multicast Routing Protocol (Informational) - 1 of 4
draft-ietf-idmr-dvmrp-v3-11.txt
Distance Vector Multicast Routing Protocol Applicability Statement (Informational)
draft-ietf-idmr-dvmrp-v3-as-01.txt
Note: Security Considerations needs update before IETF Last Call
Token: Bill Fenner
   Reviewer: Joel Halpern
     
SEC Domain-based Email Authentication Using Public Keys Advertised in the DNS (DomainKeys) (Historic) - 2 of 4
draft-delany-domainkeys-base-05.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Token: Russ Housley
   Reviewer: David Black
     
GEN Apr 11A Process Experiment in Normative Reference Handling (Experimental) - 3 of 4
draft-klensin-norm-ref-01.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Note: RFC 3933 process experiment
Token: Brian Carpenter
   Reviewer: Tom Taylor (already reviewed for 6 July)
     
SEC Cryptographic Token Key Initialization Protocol Version 1.0 (Informational) - 4 of 4
draft-nystrom-ct-kip-01.txt [Open Web Ballot]
   Token: Russ Housley
   Reviewer:

Eric Gray (already reviewed for 6 July)

   
3.2.2 Returning Item
      NONE

3.3 Individual Submissions Via RFC Editor

The IESG will use RFC 3932 responses: 1) The IESG has not
found any conflict between this document and IETF work; 2) The
IESG thinks that this work is related to IETF work done in WG
<X>, but this does not prevent publishing; 3) The IESG thinks
that publication is harmful to work in WG <X> and recommends
not publishing at this time; 4) The IESG thinks that this
document violates the IETF procedures for <X> and should
therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG
approval; 5) The IESG thinks that this document extends an
IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should
therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval.

Other matters may be recorded in comments to be passed on
to the RFC Editor as community review of the document.
          3.3.1 New Item
      AreaDate
INTThe EAP-PSK Protocol: a Pre-Shared Key EAP Method (Experimental) - 1 of 1
draft-bersani-eap-psk-11.txt
Token: Jari Arkko
3.3.2 Returning Item
      NONE