Good approximation of what will be
included in the Agenda of next Telechat (2006-03-30).
Updated
2:2:27 EDT, March 24, 2006
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet
infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"
|
2.1 WG Submissions |
|||||||||
|
2.1.1 New Item |
|||||||||
|
Area |
Date |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEC |
The Plain SASL Mechanism (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 2 |
|||||||||
Token: |
||||||||||
Reviewer: |
Mary Barnes (reviewed -07 on 2 Mar 2005) |
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
SEC |
Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Subject Identification Method (SIM) (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 2 |
|||||||||
Token: |
||||||||||
Reviewer: |
Joel Halpern (already reviewed for LC) |
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
2.1.2 Returning Item |
||||||||||
2.2 Individual Submissions |
||||||||||
|
2.2.1 New Item |
|||||||||
|
Area |
Date |
||||||||
SEC |
The Use of Galois Message Authentication Code (GMAC) in IPsec ESP and AH (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 2 |
|||||||||
Note: The T11 FC-SP Working Group needs RFC number by Friday, May 19th. |
||||||||||
Token: |
||||||||||
Reviewer: |
Spencer Dawkins (reviewed -02 for LC) |
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
APP |
Internationalized Resource Identifiers (IRIs) and Uniform Resource Identifiers (URIs) for the Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP) (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 2 |
|||||||||
Token: |
||||||||||
Reviewer: |
David Black (already reviewed for LC) |
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
2.2.2 Returning Item |
||||||||||
|
3.1 WG SubmissionsReviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable |
|||||||||
|
3.1.1 New Item |
|||||||||
|
Area |
Date |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RTG |
A Path Computation Element (PCE) Based Architecture (Informational) - 1 of 2 |
|||||||||
Token: |
||||||||||
Reviewer: |
John Loughney (reviewed for 16 Mar 2006) |
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
OPS |
Multicast Source Discovery protocol MIB (Experimental) - 2 of 2 |
|||||||||
Token: |
||||||||||
Reviewer: |
Eric Gray |
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
3.1.2 Returning Item |
||||||||||
3.2 Individual Submissions Via ADReviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable |
||||||||||
|
3.2.1 New Item |
|||||||||
|
Area |
Date |
||||||||
GEN |
Media Type Registrations for Downloadable Sounds for MIDI (Informational) - 1 of 1 |
|||||||||
Token: |
||||||||||
Reviewer: |
Tom Taylor |
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
3.2.2 Returning Item |
||||||||||
3.3 Individual Submissions Via RFC EditorThe IESG will use RFC 3932 responses: 1) The IESG has not |
||||||||||
|
3.3.1 New Item |
|||||||||
|
Area |
Date |
||||||||
OPS |
Additional Values for the NAS-Port-Type Attribute (Informational) - 1 of 1 |
|||||||||
Token: |
||||||||||
Reviewer: |
Sharon Chisholm |
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
3.3.2 Returning Item |
||||||||||
3.3.3 For Action |
||||||||||
|
Area |
Date |
||||||||
GEN |
Registration and Administration Guideline for Chinese Domain Names (Informational) - 1 of 1 |
|||||||||
Token: |
||||||||||