GenART Review Assignment for 02 March 2006



Good approximation of what will be included in the Agenda of next Telechat (2006-03-02).

Updated 18:2:13 EDT, February 23, 2006


2. Protocol Actions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet
infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"

         

2.1 WG Submissions

         

2.1.1 New Item

     

Area

Date

TSV

Definitions of Managed Objects for User Identity Authorization (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 16

draft-ietf-ips-auth-mib-07.txt

Note: PROTO Shepherd black_david@emc.com

Token:

Allison Mankin

Reviewer:

Scott Brim (already reviewed for LC)



TSV

Definitions of Managed Objects for iSCSI (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 16

draft-ietf-ips-iscsi-mib-11.txt

Note: PROTO Shepherd black_david@emc.com

Token:

Allison Mankin

Reviewer:

John Loughney (already reviewed for LC)



OPS

Feb 23

Radio Frequency (RF) Interface Management Information Base for DOCSIS 2.0 compliant RF interfaces (Proposed Standard) - 3 of 16

draft-ietf-ipcdn-docs-rfmibv2-14.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Bert Wijnen

Reviewer:

Joel Halpern (already reviewed for LC)



RTG

Node ID based RSVP Hello: A Clarification Statement (Proposed Standard) - 4 of 16

draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-node-id-based-hello-02.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Alex Zinin

Reviewer:

Spencer Dawkins (already reviewed for BCP for 16 Feb 2006)



INT

L2VPN Extensions for L2TP (Proposed Standard) - 5 of 16

draft-ietf-l2tpext-l2vpn-06.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Mark Townsley

Reviewer:

Elwyn Davies (already reviewed for LC)



OPS

Feb 23

Using the NETCONF Protocol over Blocks Extensible Exchange Protocol (BEEP) (Proposed Standard) - 6 of 16

draft-ietf-netconf-beep-08.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Bert Wijnen

Reviewer:

Elwyn Davies



OPS

Feb 23

Two-Document ballot: [Open Web Ballot] - 7 of 16

NETCONF Configuration Protocol (Proposed Standard) - 7 of 16

draft-ietf-netconf-prot-11.txt

Using the NETCONF Configuration Protocol over Secure Shell (SSH) (Proposed Standard)

draft-ietf-netconf-ssh-05.txt

Token:

Bert Wijnen

Reviewer:

Joel Halpern (reviewed -10 and -05 respectively for LC)



OPS

Feb 23

Using the Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF) Over the Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP) (Proposed Standard) - 8 of 16

draft-ietf-netconf-soap-07.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Bert Wijnen

Reviewer:

David Black (already reviewed for LC)



OPS

Feb 9

Diameter Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Application (Proposed Standard) - 9 of 16

draft-ietf-aaa-diameter-sip-app-11.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Note: A new rev is expected Feb 9 or 10 to address some AD review comments and a comment from Sam Hartman on MD5 usage.
PROTO SHEPHERD: John Loughney <john.loughney@nokia.com>

Token:

Bert Wijnen

Reviewer:

Scott Brim (already reviewed for 16 Feb 2006)



INT

DHCP Server Identifier Override Suboption (Proposed Standard) - 10 of 16

draft-ietf-dhc-server-override-03.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Margaret Wasserman

Reviewer:

John Loughney (already reviewed for LC)



INT

PWE3 Fragmentation and Reassembly (Proposed Standard) - 11 of 16

draft-ietf-pwe3-fragmentation-10.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Margaret Wasserman

Reviewer:

Scott Brim (already reviewed for LC)



INT

IP over InfiniBand: Connected Mode (Proposed Standard) - 12 of 16

draft-ietf-ipoib-connected-mode-02.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Margaret Wasserman

Reviewer:

Spencer Dawkins (already reviewed for LC)



RAI

Location Types Registry (Proposed Standard) - 13 of 16

draft-ietf-geopriv-location-types-registry-04.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Ted Hardie

Reviewer:

John Loughney



INT

Use of SHA-256 in DNSSEC Delegation Signer (DS) Resource Records (RRs) (Proposed Standard) - 14 of 16

draft-ietf-dnsext-ds-sha256-05.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Margaret Wasserman

Reviewer:

Michael Patton



RAI

Conveying Feature Tags with Session Initiation Protocol REFER Method (Proposed Standard) - 15 of 16

draft-ietf-sip-refer-feature-param-01.txt

Token:

Allison Mankin

Reviewer:

Harald Alvestrand



RAI

Framework and Security Considerations for Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Uniform Resource Identifier (URI)-List Services (Proposed Standard) - 16 of 16

draft-ietf-sipping-uri-services-05.txt

Token:

Allison Mankin

Reviewer:

Joel Halpern (already reviewed for LC)



2.1.2 Returning Item

     

Area

Date

APP

IMAP Extension for Conditional STORE operation (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 2

draft-ietf-imapext-condstore-09.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Note: Document shepherd is Lisa Dusseault <lisa@osafoundation.org>

Token:

Scott Hollenbeck

Reviewer:

David Black (reviewed -08 for LC)



RAI

Request Authorization through Dialog Identification in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 2

draft-ietf-sip-target-dialog-03.txt

Token:

Allison Mankin

Reviewer:

Spencer Dawkins (already reviewed for LC)



2.2 Individual Submissions

         

2.2.1 New Item

     

Area

Date

SEC

Transport Layer Security Session Resumption without Server-Side State (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 1

draft-salowey-tls-ticket-07.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Russ Housley

Reviewer:

Harald Alvestrand



2.2.2 Returning Item
      NONE

3. Document Actions

         

3.1 WG Submissions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable
contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If
not, what changes would make it so?"

         

3.1.1 New Item

     

Area

Date

INT

Jun 13

IPv6 Node Information Queries (Experimental) - 1 of 5

draft-ietf-ipngwg-icmp-name-lookups-15.txt

Note: The PROTO Shepherd is Bob Hinden <hinden@nokia.com>.

Token:

Margaret Wasserman

Reviewer:

John Loughney



SEC

Feb 23

The Intrusion Detection Message Exchange Format (Experimental) - 2 of 5

draft-ietf-idwg-idmef-xml-15.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Note: Returning for publication as an experimental RFC rather than a
proposed standard.  When I talked to the IESG about this the plan was
to completely remove the schema.  The authors really want appendix c
to stay as non-normative; if the IESG cannot accept this then we can
use an rfc editor note.

Token:

Sam Hartman

Reviewer:




TSV

Configuration Guidelines for DiffServ Service Classes (Informational) - 3 of 5

draft-ietf-tsvwg-diffserv-service-classes-02.txt

Note: PROTO shepherd: James Polk <jmpolk@cisco.com>
waiting for writeup

Token:

Allison Mankin

Reviewer:

Spencer Dawkins



INT

Problem Statement for bootstrapping Mobile IPv6 (Informational) - 4 of 5

draft-ietf-mip6-bootstrap-ps-04.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Margaret Wasserman

Reviewer:

Elwyn Davies



APP

FTP Transport for Secure Peer-to-Peer Business Data Interchange over the Internet (Informational) - 5 of 5

draft-ietf-ediint-as3-04.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Note: There has been almost no public discussion of this document within whatever remains of the EDIINT working group.  However, there do appear to be implementations and there thus appears to be value in publishing the document as an Informational RFC.  Significant comments that can not be addressed with an RFC Editor note might not be resolvable.

Token:

Scott Hollenbeck

Reviewer:

Joel Halpern



3.1.2 Returning Item
      NONE

3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable
contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If
not, what changes would make it so?"

         

3.2.1 New Item

     

Area

Date

APP

Media Type Registration for SMPTE Material Exchange Format (MXF) (Informational) - 1 of 1

draft-edwards-mime-mxf-02.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Scott Hollenbeck

Reviewer:

David Black (reviewed -01 for LC)



3.2.2 Returning Item
      NONE

3.2.3 For Action

     

Area

Date

APP

The application/smil and application/smil+xml Media Types (Informational) - 1 of 1

draft-hoschka-smil-media-type-12.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Note: Back on ballot to confirm the IESG is okay with a late change related to SMIL versions.  The substantive change is that SMIL is now being registered as OBSOLETE

Token:

Ted Hardie

Reviewer:




3.3 Individual Submissions Via RFC Editor

The IESG will use RFC 3932 responses: 1) The IESG has not
found any conflict between this document and IETF work; 2) The
IESG thinks that this work is related to IETF work done in WG
<X>, but this does not prevent publishing; 3) The IESG thinks
that publication is harmful to work in WG <X> and recommends
not publishing at this time; 4) The IESG thinks that this
document violates the IETF procedures for <X> and should
therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG
approval; 5) The IESG thinks that this document extends an
IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should
therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval.

Other matters may be recorded in comments to be passed on
to the RFC Editor as community review of the document.

         

3.3.1 New Item
      NONE
3.3.2 Returning Item
      NONE