Good approximation of what will be
included in the Agenda of next Telechat (2006-02-16).
Updated
18:3:16 EDT, February 9, 2006
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet
infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"
|
2.1 WG Submissions |
|||||||||
|
2.1.1 New Item |
|||||||||
|
Area |
Date |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OPS |
Feb 9 |
Three-Document ballot: [Open Web Ballot] - 1 of 10 |
||||||||
Real-time Application Quality of Service Monitoring (RAQMON) Framework (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 10 |
||||||||||
Note: IETF Last Call still in progress, ends Monday Feb 13. |
||||||||||
Real-time Application Quality of Service Monitoring (RAQMON) MIB (Proposed Standard) |
||||||||||
Transport Mappings for Real-time Application Quality of Service Monitoring (RAQMON) Protocol Data Unit (PDU) (Proposed Standard) |
||||||||||
Token: |
||||||||||
Reviewer: |
Joel Halpern (already reviewed for LC) |
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
OPS |
Jan 30 |
Multimedia Terminal Adapter (MTA) Management Information Base for PacketCable and IPCablecom compliant devices (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 10 |
||||||||
Note: Still in IETF Last Call, which ends Feb 13 (Monday); |
||||||||||
Token: |
||||||||||
Reviewer: |
Harald Alvestrand |
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
RTG |
Node ID based RSVP Hello: A Clarification Statement (BCP) - 3 of 10 |
|||||||||
draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-node-id-based-hello-02.txt [Open Web Ballot] |
||||||||||
Token: |
||||||||||
Reviewer: |
Spencer Dawkins |
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
SEC |
The Key ID Information Type for the General Extension Payload in MIKEY (Proposed Standard) - 4 of 10 |
|||||||||
Token: |
||||||||||
Reviewer: |
Elwyn Davies (reviewed -01 for LC on 8 July 2005) |
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
OPS |
Classless Inter-Domain Routing (CIDR): The Internet Address Assignment and Aggregation Plan (Proposed Standard) - 5 of 10 |
|||||||||
Token: |
||||||||||
Reviewer: |
John Loughney |
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
OPS |
Feb 9 |
Diameter Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Application (Proposed Standard) - 6 of 10 |
||||||||
Note: A new rev is expected Feb 9 or 10 to address some AD
review comments and a comment from Sam Hartman on MD5 usage. |
||||||||||
Token: |
||||||||||
Reviewer: |
Scott Brim |
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
RTG |
Three-Document ballot: [Open Web Ballot] - 7 of 10 |
|||||||||
LDP Specification (Draft Standard) - 7 of 10 |
||||||||||
Experience with the LDP protocol (Informational) |
||||||||||
LDP Implementation Survey Results (Informational) |
||||||||||
Token: |
||||||||||
Reviewer: |
David Black |
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
SEC |
Two-Document ballot: [Open Web Ballot] - 8 of 10 |
|||||||||
Public Key Cryptography for Initial Authentication in Kerberos (Proposed Standard) - 8 of 10 |
||||||||||
Note: proto shepherd: jhutz@cmu.edu |
||||||||||
OCSP Support for PKINIT (Proposed Standard) |
||||||||||
Note: Minor comment about security considerations sent to WG. I'm holding this draft until pkinit catches up. |
||||||||||
Token: |
||||||||||
Reviewer: |
Elwyn Davies (reviewed -33 and -06 for LC) |
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
SEC |
Using the GOST R 34.10-94, GOST R 34.10-2001 and GOST R 34.11-94 algorithms with the Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate and CRL Profile. (Proposed Standard) - 9 of 10 |
|||||||||
Note: Proto shepherd is Steve Kent <kent@bbn.com> |
||||||||||
Token: |
||||||||||
Reviewer: |
Michael Patton |
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
RAI |
Suppression of Session Initiation Protocol REFER Method Implicit Subscription (Proposed Standard) - 10 of 10 |
|||||||||
draft-ietf-sip-refer-with-norefersub-04.txt [Open Web Ballot] |
||||||||||
Note: PROTO shepherd dean.willis@softarmor.com Last Call ends 2/17. On IESG agenda 2/16. Comments encouraged to the end. |
||||||||||
Token: |
||||||||||
Reviewer: |
Elwyn Davies (already reviewed for LC) |
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
2.1.2 Returning Item |
||||||||||
|
Area |
Date |
||||||||
RTG |
Subcodes for BGP Cease Notification Message (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 6 |
|||||||||
Token: |
||||||||||
Reviewer: |
Mary Barnes (Lakshminath Dondeti reviewed -05 for LC on 25 April 2005) |
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
INT |
Virtual Private LAN Service (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 6 |
|||||||||
Note: This document and draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-ldp are different solutions to similar problems. L2VPN agreed to advance both and essentially "let the market decide." |
||||||||||
Token: |
||||||||||
Reviewer: |
Elwyn Davies (already reviewed for 2 Feb 2006) |
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
INT |
Virtual Private LAN Services over MPLS (Proposed Standard) - 3 of 6 |
|||||||||
Note: This document and draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-bgp are different solutions to similar problems. L2VPN agreed to advance both and essentially "let the market decide." |
||||||||||
Token: |
||||||||||
Reviewer: |
Elwyn Davies (already reviewed for 2 Feb 2006) |
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
INT |
Mobile IPv4 Challenge/Response Extensions (revised) (Proposed Standard) - 4 of 6 |
|||||||||
Token: |
||||||||||
Reviewer: |
Elwyn Davies (reviewed -04 on 26 Sept 2005) |
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
INT |
HMAC SHA TSIG Algorithm Identifiers (Proposed Standard) - 5 of 6 |
|||||||||
Note: The PROTO Shepherd for this document is Olafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com>. |
||||||||||
Token: |
||||||||||
Reviewer: |
Elwyn Davies (reviewed -05 for LC) |
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
APP |
Sieve Extension: Relational Tests (Proposed Standard) - 6 of 6 |
|||||||||
Note: Document shepherd is Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> |
||||||||||
Token: |
||||||||||
Reviewer: |
Harald Alvestrand (already reviewed for LC) |
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
2.2 Individual Submissions |
||||||||||
|
2.2.1 New Item |
|||||||||
|
3.1 WG SubmissionsReviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable |
||||
|
3.1.1 New Item |
||||
|
Area |
Date |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
INT |
DHCP: IPv4 and IPv6 Dual-Stack Issues (Informational) - 1 of 4 |
||||
Token: |
|||||
Reviewer: |
John Loughney |
||||
|
|
||||
RAI |
Trait-based Authorization Requirements for the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) (Informational) - 2 of 4 |
||||
Note: PROTO shepherd gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com |
|||||
Token: |
|||||
Reviewer: |
Spencer Dawkins |
||||
|
|
||||
OPS |
Feb 9 |
Evaluation of Candidate CAPWAP Protocols (Informational) - 3 of 4 |
|||
Token: |
|||||
Reviewer: |
Harald Alvestrand |
||||
|
|
||||
OPS |
Feb 9 |
Objectives for Control and Provisioning of Wireless Access Points (CAPWAP) (Informational) - 4 of 4 |
|||
Token: |
|||||
Reviewer: |
John Loughney |
||||
|
|
||||
3.1.2 Returning Item |
|||||
|
Area |
Date |
|||
INT |
Mobile IPv6 and Firewalls: Problem statement (Informational) - 1 of 1 |
||||
Token: |
|||||
Reviewer: |
Spencer Dawkins (reviewed -02 for 18 Aug 2005) |
||||
|
|
||||
3.2 Individual Submissions Via ADReviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable |
|||||
|
3.2.1 New Item |
||||
|
Area |
Date |
|||
TSV |
SDP Descriptors for FLUTE (Experimental) - 1 of 2 |
||||
Token: |
|||||
Reviewer: |
Joel Halpern |
||||
|
|
||||
SEC |
Repeated Authentication in IKEv2 (Informational) - 2 of 2 |
||||
Token: |
|||||
Reviewer: |
Joel Halpern (reviewed -04 for LC) |
||||
|
|
||||
3.2.2 Returning Item |
|||||
3.3 Individual Submissions Via RFC EditorThe IESG will use RFC 3932 responses: 1) The IESG has not |
|||||
|
3.3.1 New Item |
||||
|
Area |
Date |
|||
GEN |
Simple Middlebox Configuration (SIMCO) Protocol Version 3.0 (Experimental) - 1 of 1 |
||||
Token: |
|||||
Reviewer: |
|
||||
|
|
||||
3.3.2 Returning Item |
|||||