GenART Review Assignment for 16 February 2006

Good approximation of what will be included in the Agenda of next Telechat (2006-02-16).

Updated 18:3:16 EDT, February 9, 2006


2. Protocol Actions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet
infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"

         

2.1 WG Submissions

         

2.1.1 New Item

     

Area

Date

OPS

Feb 9

Three-Document ballot: [Open Web Ballot] - 1 of 10

Real-time Application Quality of Service Monitoring (RAQMON) Framework (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 10

draft-ietf-rmonmib-raqmon-framework-14.txt

Note: IETF Last Call still in progress, ends Monday Feb 13.
One new rev will come out Monday to address GenArt review comments.

Real-time Application Quality of Service Monitoring (RAQMON) MIB (Proposed Standard)

draft-ietf-rmonmib-raqmon-mib-11.txt

Transport Mappings for Real-time Application Quality of Service Monitoring (RAQMON) Protocol Data Unit (PDU) (Proposed Standard)

draft-ietf-rmonmib-raqmon-pdu-12.txt

Token:

Bert Wijnen

Reviewer:

Joel Halpern (already reviewed for LC)



OPS

Jan 30

Multimedia Terminal Adapter (MTA) Management Information Base for PacketCable and IPCablecom compliant devices (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 10

draft-ietf-ipcdn-pktc-mtamib-09.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Note: Still in IETF Last Call, which ends Feb 13 (Monday);
So if serious comments come up from that I may have to withdraw
it from Agenda.

Token:

Bert Wijnen

Reviewer:

Harald Alvestrand



RTG

Node ID based RSVP Hello: A Clarification Statement (BCP) - 3 of 10

draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-node-id-based-hello-02.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Alex Zinin

Reviewer:

Spencer Dawkins



SEC

The Key ID Information Type for the General Extension Payload in MIKEY (Proposed Standard) - 4 of 10

draft-ietf-msec-newtype-keyid-03.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Russ Housley

Reviewer:

Elwyn Davies (reviewed -01 for LC on 8 July 2005)



OPS

Classless Inter-Domain Routing (CIDR): The Internet Address Assignment and Aggregation Plan (Proposed Standard) - 5 of 10

draft-ietf-grow-rfc1519bis-04.txt

Token:

David Kessens

Reviewer:

John Loughney



OPS

Feb 9

Diameter Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Application (Proposed Standard) - 6 of 10

draft-ietf-aaa-diameter-sip-app-10.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Note: A new rev is expected Feb 9 or 10 to address some AD review comments and a comment from Sam Hartman on MD5 usage.
PROTO SHEPHERD: John Loughney <john.loughney@nokia.com>

Token:

Bert Wijnen

Reviewer:

Scott Brim



RTG

Three-Document ballot: [Open Web Ballot] - 7 of 10

LDP Specification (Draft Standard) - 7 of 10

draft-ietf-mpls-rfc3036bis-03.txt

Experience with the LDP protocol (Informational)

draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-experience-00.txt

LDP Implementation Survey Results (Informational)

draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-survey2002-00.txt

Token:

Alex Zinin

Reviewer:

David Black



SEC

Two-Document ballot: [Open Web Ballot] - 8 of 10

Public Key Cryptography for Initial Authentication in Kerberos (Proposed Standard) - 8 of 10

draft-ietf-cat-kerberos-pk-init-34.txt

Note: proto shepherd: jhutz@cmu.edu

OCSP Support for PKINIT (Proposed Standard)

draft-ietf-krb-wg-ocsp-for-pkinit-06.txt

Note: Minor comment about security considerations sent to WG.  I'm holding this draft until pkinit catches up.

Token:

Sam Hartman

Reviewer:

Elwyn Davies (reviewed -33 and -06 for LC)



SEC

Using the GOST R 34.10-94, GOST R 34.10-2001 and GOST R 34.11-94 algorithms with the Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate and CRL Profile. (Proposed Standard) - 9 of 10

draft-ietf-pkix-gost-cppk-05.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Note: Proto shepherd is Steve Kent <kent@bbn.com>

Token:

Russ Housley

Reviewer:

Michael Patton



RAI

Suppression of Session Initiation Protocol REFER Method Implicit Subscription (Proposed Standard) - 10 of 10

draft-ietf-sip-refer-with-norefersub-04.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Note: PROTO shepherd dean.willis@softarmor.com Last Call ends 2/17.  On IESG agenda 2/16.  Comments encouraged to the end.

Token:

Allison Mankin

Reviewer:

Elwyn Davies (already reviewed for LC)



2.1.2 Returning Item

     

Area

Date

RTG

Subcodes for BGP Cease Notification Message (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 6

draft-ietf-idr-cease-subcode-07.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Bill Fenner

Reviewer:

Mary Barnes (Lakshminath Dondeti reviewed -05 for LC on 25 April 2005)



INT

Virtual Private LAN Service (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 6

draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-bgp-06.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Note: This document and draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-ldp are different solutions to similar problems. L2VPN agreed to advance both and essentially "let the market decide."

Token:

Mark Townsley

Reviewer:

Elwyn Davies (already reviewed for 2 Feb 2006)



INT

Virtual Private LAN Services over MPLS (Proposed Standard) - 3 of 6

draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-ldp-08.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Note: This document and draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-bgp are different solutions to similar problems. L2VPN agreed to advance both and essentially "let the market decide."

Token:

Mark Townsley

Reviewer:

Elwyn Davies (already reviewed for 2 Feb 2006)



INT

Mobile IPv4 Challenge/Response Extensions (revised) (Proposed Standard) - 4 of 6

draft-ietf-mip4-rfc3012bis-05.txt

Token:

Margaret Wasserman

Reviewer:

Elwyn Davies (reviewed -04 on 26 Sept 2005)



INT

HMAC SHA TSIG Algorithm Identifiers (Proposed Standard) - 5 of 6

draft-ietf-dnsext-tsig-sha-06.txt

Note: The PROTO Shepherd for this document is Olafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com>.

Token:

Margaret Wasserman

Reviewer:

Elwyn Davies (reviewed -05 for LC)



APP

Sieve Extension: Relational Tests (Proposed Standard) - 6 of 6

draft-ietf-sieve-3431bis-04.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Note: Document shepherd is Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>

Token:

Scott Hollenbeck

Reviewer:

Harald Alvestrand (already reviewed for LC)



2.2 Individual Submissions

         

2.2.1 New Item
      NONE
2.2.2 Returning Item
      NONE

3. Document Actions

         

3.1 WG Submissions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable
contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If
not, what changes would make it so?"

         

3.1.1 New Item

     

Area

Date

INT

DHCP: IPv4 and IPv6 Dual-Stack Issues (Informational) - 1 of 4

draft-ietf-dhc-dual-stack-04.txt

Token:

Margaret Wasserman

Reviewer:

John Loughney



RAI

Trait-based Authorization Requirements for the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) (Informational) - 2 of 4

draft-ietf-sipping-trait-authz-02.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Note: PROTO shepherd gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com

Token:

Allison Mankin

Reviewer:

Spencer Dawkins



OPS

Feb 9

Evaluation of Candidate CAPWAP Protocols (Informational) - 3 of 4

draft-ietf-capwap-eval-00.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Bert Wijnen

Reviewer:

Harald Alvestrand



OPS

Feb 9

Objectives for Control and Provisioning of Wireless Access Points (CAPWAP) (Informational) - 4 of 4

draft-ietf-capwap-objectives-04.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Bert Wijnen

Reviewer:

John Loughney



3.1.2 Returning Item

     

Area

Date

INT

Mobile IPv6 and Firewalls: Problem statement (Informational) - 1 of 1

draft-ietf-mip6-firewalls-04.txt

Token:

Margaret Wasserman

Reviewer:

Spencer Dawkins (reviewed -02 for 18 Aug 2005)



3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable
contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If
not, what changes would make it so?"

         

3.2.1 New Item

     

Area

Date

TSV

SDP Descriptors for FLUTE (Experimental) - 1 of 2

draft-mehta-rmt-flute-sdp-05.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Allison Mankin

Reviewer:

Joel Halpern



SEC

Repeated Authentication in IKEv2 (Informational) - 2 of 2

draft-nir-ikev2-auth-lt-05.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Russ Housley

Reviewer:

Joel Halpern (reviewed -04 for LC)



3.2.2 Returning Item
      NONE

3.3 Individual Submissions Via RFC Editor

The IESG will use RFC 3932 responses: 1) The IESG has not
found any conflict between this document and IETF work; 2) The
IESG thinks that this work is related to IETF work done in WG
<X>, but this does not prevent publishing; 3) The IESG thinks
that publication is harmful to work in WG <X> and recommends
not publishing at this time; 4) The IESG thinks that this
document violates the IETF procedures for <X> and should
therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG
approval; 5) The IESG thinks that this document extends an
IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should
therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval.

Other matters may be recorded in comments to be passed on
to the RFC Editor as community review of the document.

         

3.3.1 New Item

     

Area

Date

GEN

Simple Middlebox Configuration (SIMCO) Protocol Version 3.0 (Experimental) - 1 of 1

draft-stiemerling-midcom-simco-08.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Jon Peterson

Reviewer:




3.3.2 Returning Item
      NONE