GenART Review Assignment for 2 February 2006

Good approximation of what will be included in the Agenda of next Telechat (2006-02-02).

Updated 22:2:30 EDT, January 26, 2006

2. Protocol Actions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet
infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"

         

2.1 WG Submissions

         

2.1.1 New Item

     

Area

Date

APP

LDAP: Authentication Methods and Security Mechanisms (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 12

draft-ietf-ldapbis-authmeth-18.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Ted Hardie

Reviewer:

Spencer Dawkins (already reviewed for LC)



RTG

Definition of an RRO node-id subobject (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 12

draft-ietf-mpls-nodeid-subobject-07.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Alex Zinin

Reviewer:

John Loughney



RTG

Anycast-RP using PIM (Proposed Standard) - 3 of 12

draft-ietf-pim-anycast-rp-04.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Note: A -05 is coming to fix the Security Considerations to point just to pim-sm-v2-new and to fix some minor reference issues.

Token:

Bill Fenner

Reviewer:

Joel Halpern (reviewed -04 for LC)



INT

Virtual Private LAN Service (Proposed Standard) - 4 of 12

draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-bgp-06.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Note: This document and draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-ldp are different solutions to similar problems. L2VPN agreed to advance both and essentially "let the market decide."

Token:

Mark Townsley

Reviewer:

Elwyn Davies (already reviewed for 19 Jan telechat)



INT

Virtual Private LAN Services over MPLS (Proposed Standard) - 5 of 12

draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-ldp-08.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Note: This document and draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-bgp are different solutions to similar problems. L2VPN agreed to advance both and essentially "let the market decide."

Token:

Mark Townsley

Reviewer:

Elwyn Davies (already reviewed for 19 Jan telechat)



APP

Lemonade Profile (Proposed Standard) - 6 of 12

draft-ietf-lemonade-profile-07.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Ted Hardie

Reviewer:

Spencer Dawkins



INT

The Role of Wildcards in the Domain Name System (Proposed Standard) - 7 of 12

draft-ietf-dnsext-wcard-clarify-10.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Note: The PROTO shepherd for this document is Olaf Kolkman <olaf@nlnetlabs.nl>.

Token:

Margaret Wasserman

Reviewer:

Harald Alvestrand (reviewed -09 for LC)



TSV

A Resource Reservation Protocol Extension for the Reduction of Bandwidth of a Reservation Flow (Proposed Standard) - 8 of 12

draft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-bw-reduction-02.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Allison Mankin

Reviewer:

Joel Halpern (reviewed -01 for LC)



SEC

Using the GOST 28147-89, GOST R 34.11-94, GOST R 34.10-94 and GOST R 34.10-2001 algorithms with the Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) (Proposed Standard) - 9 of 12

draft-ietf-smime-gost-07.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Russ Housley

Reviewer:

David Black (reviewed -06 for LC)



APP

Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP): Technical Specification Road Map (Proposed Standard) - 10 of 12

draft-ietf-ldapbis-roadmap-08.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Ted Hardie

Reviewer:

Scott Brim (already reviewed for LC)



SEC

Kerberos Cryptosystem Negotiation Extension (Proposed Standard) - 11 of 12

draft-zhu-kerb-enctype-nego-04.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Sam Hartman

Reviewer:

Michael Patton



RAI

RTP Payload Format for Video Codec 1 (VC-1) (Proposed Standard) - 12 of 12

draft-ietf-avt-rtp-vc1-06.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Note: PROTO shepherd Colin Perkins csp@csperkins.org

Token:

Allison Mankin

Reviewer:

Scott Brim (Note: LC ends on 1 February)



2.1.2 Returning Item
      NONE

2.2 Individual Submissions

         

2.2.1 New Item

     

Area

Date

SEC

The AES-CMAC-96 Algorithm and its use with IPsec (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 3

draft-songlee-aes-cmac-96-03.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Russ Housley

Reviewer:

Joel Halpern (already reviewed for LC)



APP

Collected extensions to IMAP4 ABNF (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 3

draft-melnikov-imap-ext-abnf-08.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Scott Hollenbeck

Reviewer:

Elwyn Davies (reviewed -05 for LC)



APP

COSINE LDAP/X.500 Schema (Proposed Standard) - 3 of 3

draft-zeilenga-ldap-cosine-01.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Ted Hardie

Reviewer:

Harald Alvestrand (already reviewed for LC)



2.2.2 Returning Item
      NONE

3. Document Actions

         

3.1 WG Submissions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable
contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If
not, what changes would make it so?"

         

3.1.1 New Item
      NONE
3.1.2 Returning Item
      NONE

3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable
contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If
not, what changes would make it so?"

         

3.2.1 New Item

     

Area

Date

SEC

US Secure Hash Algorithms (SHA) (Informational) - 1 of 1

draft-eastlake-sha2-01.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Russ Housley

Reviewer:

John Loughney



3.2.2 Returning Item
      NONE

3.3 Individual Submissions Via RFC Editor

The IESG will use RFC 3932 responses: 1) The IESG has not
found any conflict between this document and IETF work; 2) The
IESG thinks that this work is related to IETF work done in WG
<X>, but this does not prevent publishing; 3) The IESG thinks
that publication is harmful to work in WG <X> and recommends
not publishing at this time; 4) The IESG thinks that this
document violates the IETF procedures for <X> and should
therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG
approval; 5) The IESG thinks that this document extends an
IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should
therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval.

Other matters may be recorded in comments to be passed on
to the RFC Editor as community review of the document.

         

3.3.1 New Item
      NONE
3.3.2 Returning Item
      NONE