Good approximation of what will be
included in the Agenda of next Telechat (2005-12-01).
Updated
10:2:21 EDT, November 28, 2005
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet
infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"
|
2.1 WG Submissions |
||||||||||
|
2.1.1 New Item |
||||||||||
|
Area |
Date |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RTG |
Detecting MPLS Data Plane Failures (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 20 |
||||||||||
Note: ITU requires an RFC number by December 12th. |
|||||||||||
Token: |
|||||||||||
Reviewer: |
David Black (already reviewed for 10/27) |
||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
INT |
Four-Document ballot: [Open Web Ballot] - 2 of 20 |
||||||||||
Resolution of FQDN Conflicts among DHCP Clients (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 20 |
|||||||||||
Note: 11/21/05:Â Check for last minute IETF LC comments before telechat. |
|||||||||||
A DNS RR for Encoding DHCP Information (DHCID RR) (Proposed Standard) |
|||||||||||
The DHCP Client FQDN Option (Proposed Standard) |
|||||||||||
Note: Note: 3 related DDNS documents need to be reconciled. See email to dhcwg list on 2003-06-05. |
|||||||||||
The DHCPv6 Client FQDN Option (Proposed Standard) |
|||||||||||
Token: |
|||||||||||
Reviewer: |
Harald Alvestrand |
||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
TSV |
Definitions of Managed Objects for FCIP (Proposed Standard) - 3 of 20 |
||||||||||
Note: PROTO shepherd black_david@emc.com |
|||||||||||
Token: |
|||||||||||
Reviewer: |
John Loughney |
||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
RTG |
Multiprotocol Extensions for BGP-4 (Draft Standard) - 4 of 20 |
||||||||||
Token: |
|||||||||||
Reviewer: |
Joel Halpern (already reviewed for LC) |
||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
OPS |
Nov 15 |
Remote Network Monitoring Management Information Base Version 2 (Draft Standard) - 5 of 20 |
|||||||||
Token: |
|||||||||||
Reviewer: |
Harald Alvestrand |
||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
INT |
Mobile IPv4 Dynamic Home Agent Assignment (Proposed Standard) - 6 of 20 |
||||||||||
Token: |
|||||||||||
Reviewer: |
Joel Halpern (reviewed -05 for 18 Aug Telechat) |
||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
TSV |
Signaling System 7 (SS7) Message Transfer Part 3 (MTP3) - User Adaptation Layer (M3UA) (Proposed Standard) - 7 of 20 |
||||||||||
Token: |
|||||||||||
Reviewer: |
David Black (reviewed -04 for LC) |
||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
RTG |
Avoiding Equal Cost Multipath Treatment in MPLS Networks (BCP) - 8 of 20 |
||||||||||
Token: |
|||||||||||
Reviewer: |
John Loughney (reviewed -01 for LC) |
||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
INT |
Foreign Agent Error Extension for Mobile IPv4 (Proposed Standard) - 9 of 20 |
||||||||||
Token: |
|||||||||||
Reviewer: |
Harald Alvestrand (reviewed for LC) |
||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
APP |
CIPID: Contact Information in Presence Information Data Format (Proposed Standard) - 10 of 20 |
||||||||||
Token: |
|||||||||||
Reviewer: |
Spencer Dawkins (reviewed for LC) |
||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
APP |
RPID: Rich Presence Extensions to the Presence Information Data Format (PIDF) (Proposed Standard) - 11 of 20 |
||||||||||
Note: The proto write-up (available in tracker comment log)
discusses why this document was not combined with cipid and
future, despite them being interconnected. Rough consensus
for this approach does |
|||||||||||
Token: |
|||||||||||
Reviewer: |
David Black (reviewed for LC) |
||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
APP |
Timed Presence Extensions to the Presence Information Data Format (PIDF) to Indicate Status Information for Past and Future Time Intervals (Proposed Standard) - 12 of 20 |
||||||||||
Token: |
|||||||||||
Reviewer: |
Avri Doria (assigned for LC) |
||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
OPS |
RADIUS Extension for Digest Authentication (Proposed Standard) - 13 of 20 |
||||||||||
Note: Note: Bernard Aboba is the proto shepherd |
|||||||||||
Token: |
|||||||||||
Reviewer: |
John Loughney |
||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
OPS |
Nov 17 |
Transmission of IPv6, IPv4 and ARP Packets over Fibre Channel (Proposed Standard) - 14 of 20 |
|||||||||
draft-ietf-imss-ip-over-fibre-channel-03.txt [Open Web Ballot] |
|||||||||||
Token: |
|||||||||||
Reviewer: |
Lakshminath Dondeti |
||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
INT |
DHCPv6 Relay Agent Remote ID Option (Proposed Standard) - 15 of 20 |
||||||||||
Token: |
|||||||||||
Reviewer: |
Lakshminath Dondeti |
||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
INT |
DHCPv6 Relay Agent Subscriber-ID Option (Proposed Standard) - 16 of 20 |
||||||||||
Token: |
|||||||||||
Reviewer: |
Scott Brim |
||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
TSV |
An ENUM Registry Type for the Internet Registry Information Service (Proposed Standard) - 17 of 20 |
||||||||||
Note: Finishes Last Call on October 27. On IESG agenda, however LC comments urged and will be heeded. |
|||||||||||
Token: |
|||||||||||
Reviewer: |
Elwyn Davies (reviewed for LC) |
||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
RTG |
Management Information Base for IS-IS (Proposed Standard) - 18 of 20 |
||||||||||
Token: |
|||||||||||
Reviewer: |
David Black (reviewed for LC) |
||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
APP |
A Data Model for Presence (Proposed Standard) - 19 of 20 |
||||||||||
draft-ietf-simple-presence-data-model-06.txt [Open Web Ballot] |
|||||||||||
Note: Much of the language here reflects long discussion and compromise. Please recognize that when suggesting wordsmithing changes. |
|||||||||||
Token: |
|||||||||||
Reviewer: |
Elwyn Davies (reviewed for LC) |
||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
SEC |
Two-Document ballot: [Open Web Ballot] - 20 of 20 |
||||||||||
A PRF API extension for the GSS-API (Proposed Standard) - 20 of 20 |
|||||||||||
Note: proto shepherd: jaltman@columbia.edu |
|||||||||||
A PRF for the Kerberos V GSS-API Mechanism (Proposed Standard) |
|||||||||||
Token: |
|||||||||||
Reviewer: |
Scott Brim |
||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
2.1.2 Returning Item |
|||||||||||
|
Area |
Date |
|||||||||
TSV |
Jun 18 |
SDP: Session Description Protocol (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 3 |
|||||||||
Note: Ancient returning item: no longer has enough ballot positions to advance. Mercy for these poor souls, new reviewers! |
|||||||||||
Token: |
|||||||||||
Reviewer: |
Spencer Dawkins |
||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
APP |
Mapping Between the Multimedia Messaging Service (MMS) and Internet Mail (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 3 |
||||||||||
Note: This is returning post-appeal processing by the WG and post replacement IETF Last Call. If we can complete this on 12/1, it will likely be referenced by OMA (currently the text is copied) |
|||||||||||
Token: |
|||||||||||
Reviewer: |
Michael Patton (reviewed previously) |
||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
INT |
Detecting Network Attachment in IPv4 (DNAv4) (Proposed Standard) - 3 of 3 |
||||||||||
Note: This document has changed substantially since the IESG reviewed version -12 based on post-LC comments. Back for a re-review before sending to the RFC Editor. |
|||||||||||
Token: |
|||||||||||
Reviewer: |
John Loughney (reviewed -11, Mary re-reviewed -12) |
||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
2.2 Individual Submissions |
|||||||||||
|
2.2.1 New Item |
||||||||||
|
Area |
Date |
|||||||||
SEC |
RIPv2 Cryptographic Authentication (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 1 |
||||||||||
Token: |
|||||||||||
|
Reviewer: |
Spencer Dawkins (reviewed -02 for LC) |
|||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
2.2.2 Returning Item |
|||||||||||
|
3.1 WG SubmissionsReviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable |
||||||||||||||||||
|
3.1.1 New Item |
||||||||||||||||||
|
Area |
Date |
|||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSV |
A Framework for Supporting Emergency Telecommunications Services (ETS) Within a Single Administrative Domain (Informational) - 1 of 5 |
||||||||||||||||||
Token: |
|||||||||||||||||||
Reviewer: |
Joel Halpern |
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
OPS |
BGP MED Considerations (Informational) - 2 of 5 |
||||||||||||||||||
draft-ietf-grow-bgp-med-considerations-04.txt [Open Web Ballot] |
|||||||||||||||||||
Note: Note: Dave Meyer is the protoshepherd |
|||||||||||||||||||
Token: |
|||||||||||||||||||
Reviewer: |
John Loughney |
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
RTG |
Two-Document ballot: [Open Web Ballot] - 3 of 5 |
||||||||||||||||||
OAM Requirements for MPLS Networks (Informational) - 3 of 5 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Note: ITU requires an RFC number by December 12th. |
|||||||||||||||||||
A Framework for MPLS Operations and Management (OAM) (Informational) |
|||||||||||||||||||
Token: |
|||||||||||||||||||
Reviewer: |
David Black |
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
RTG |
Signaling Requirements for Point to Multipoint Traffic Engineered MPLS LSPs (Informational) - 4 of 5 |
||||||||||||||||||
draft-ietf-mpls-p2mp-sig-requirement-03.txt [Open Web Ballot] |
|||||||||||||||||||
Token: |
|||||||||||||||||||
Reviewer: |
Harald Alvestrand |
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
INT |
NEMO Home Network models (Informational) - 5 of 5 |
||||||||||||||||||
draft-ietf-nemo-home-network-models-05.txt [Open Web Ballot] |
|||||||||||||||||||
Token: |
|||||||||||||||||||
Reviewer: |
Scott Brim |
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
3.1.2 Returning Item |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Area |
Date |
|||||||||||||||||
OPS |
Operational Considerations and Issues with IPv6 DNS (Informational) - 1 of 1 |
||||||||||||||||||
Note: To check (for the second time) on the status of the resolution of Thomas Narten/Margaret Wasserman's DISCUSS. |
|||||||||||||||||||
Token: |
|||||||||||||||||||
Reviewer: |
Michael Patton (reviewed previously) |
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
3.2 Individual Submissions Via ADReviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
3.2.1 New Item |
||||||||||||||||||
|
Area |
Date |
|||||||||||||||||
SEC |
UMAC: Message Authentication Code using Universal Hashing (Informational) - 1 of 1 |
||||||||||||||||||
Token: |
|||||||||||||||||||
Reviewer: |
Joel Halpern |
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
3.3 Individual Submissions Via RFC EditorThe IESG will use RFC 3932 responses: 1) The IESG has not |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
3.3.1 New Item |
||||||||||||||||||
|
Area |
Date |
|||||||||||||||||
GEN |
Nov 23 |
The Managed Object Aggregation MIB (Informational) - 1 of 1 |
|||||||||||||||||
Token: |
|||||||||||||||||||
Reviewer: |
Lakshminath Dondeti |
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
3.3.2 Returning Item |
|||||||||||||||||||
3.3.3 For Action |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Area |
Date |
|||||||||||||||||
INT |
DISCOVER: Supporting Multicast DNS Queries (Experimental) - 1 of 1 |
||||||||||||||||||
Note: Note: Submitted to RFC Editor, being treated as an ISR. |
|||||||||||||||||||
Token: |
|||||||||||||||||||