GenART Review Assignment for 050526

2.1 WG Submissions

2.1.1 New Item

APP

LDAP: The Protocol (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 6

draft-ietf-ldapbis-protocol-30.txt

Token:

Ted Hardie

Review:

Joel Halpern - already reviewed for IETF LC

OPS

May 16

Definitions of Managed Objects for High Bit-Rate DSL - 2nd generation (HDSL2) and Single-Pair High-Speed Digital Subscriber Line (SHDSL) Lines (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 6

draft-ietf-adslmib-gshdslbis-10.txt

Note: This document is still shepherded by AD (Bert)

Token:

Bert Wijnen

Review:

David Black – already reviewed for IETF LC

SEC

Pre-Shared Key Ciphersuites for Transport Layer Security (TLS) (Proposed Standard) - 3 of 6

draft-ietf-tls-psk-08.txt

Token:

Russ Housley

Review:

Lakshminath Dondeti – reviewed -07 for IETF LC

INT

Ultra Lightweight Encapsulation (ULE) for transmission of IP datagrams over an MPEG-2 Transport Stream (Proposed Standard) - 4 of 6

draft-ietf-ipdvb-ule-05.txt

Review:

Michael Patton

Token:

Margaret Wasserman

INT

Optimistic Duplicate Address Detection for IPv6 (Proposed Standard) - 5 of 6

draft-ietf-ipv6-optimistic-dad-05.txt

Review:

Spencer Dawkins

Token:

Margaret Wasserman

TSV

IANA Registration for Enumservice VOID (Proposed Standard) - 6 of 6

draft-ietf-enum-void-01.txt

Note: Last Call ends 5/25 (no controversy expected)
PROTO shepherd Rich Shockey rich@shockey.us

Token:

Allison Mankin

Review:

Suzanne Woolf

2.1.2 Returning Item
      NONE

2.2 Individual Submissions

2.2.1 New Item

TSV

The Codecs Parameter for "Bucket" Media Types (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 2

draft-gellens-mime-bucket-03.txt

Token:

Allison Mankin

Review:

Mary Barnes – already reviewed for IETF LC

APP

The gopher URI Scheme (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 2

draft-hoffman-gopher-uri-03.txt

Token:

Ted Hardie

Review:

Elwyn Davies – already reviewed for IETF LC

2.2.2 Returning Item
      NONE

3.1 WG Submissions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable
contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If
not, what changes would make it so?"

3.1.1 New Item
      NONE
3.1.2 Returning Item
      NONE

3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable
contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If
not, what changes would make it so?"

3.2.1 New Item

3.2.2 Returning Item

APP

Three-Document ballot: - 1 of 2

SMTP Service Extension for Indicating the Responsible Submitter of an E-mail Message (Experimental) - 1 of 2

draft-katz-submitter-01.txt

Note: Revision received; please review 01

Sender ID: Authenticating E-Mail (Experimental)

draft-lyon-senderid-core-01.txt

Note: Sent to dea-dir

Purported Responsible Address in E-Mail Messages (Experimental)

draft-lyon-senderid-pra-01.txt

Note: Sent to dea-dir

Token:

Ted Hardie

Review:

Scott Brim – already reviewed draft-katz-submitter-00.txt,
draft-lyon-senderid-core-00.txt,
draft-lyon-senderid-pra-00.txt

INT

Identity selection hints for Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP) (Informational) - 2 of 2

draft-adrangi-eap-network-discovery-12.txt

Token:

Margaret Wasserman

Review:

Spencer Dawkins

3.3 Individual Submissions Via RFC Editor

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Does this document
represent an end run around the IETF's working groups
or its procedures? Does this document present an incompatible
change to IETF technologies as if it were compatible?" Other
matters may be sent to the RFC Editor in private review.

3.3.1 New Item
      NONE
3.3.2 Returning Item
      NONE