Gen-ART Review Assiginements 041216




2. Protocol Actions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet
infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"

         

2.1 WG Submissions

         

2.1.1 New Item

     

Area

Date

TSV

RTP payload Format for H.264 Video (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 2

draft-ietf-avt-rtp-h264-11.txt

Token:

Allison Mankin

Review

John Loughney



TSV

A Negative Acknowledgement Mechanism for Signaling Compression (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 2

draft-ietf-rohc-sigcomp-nack-02.txt

Token:

Allison Mankin

Review

Lucy Lynch



2.1.2 Returning Item

     

Area

Date

INT

Transmission of IP over InfiniBand (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 1

draft-ietf-ipoib-ip-over-infiniband-08.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Note: On agenda to check if Ted's, David's and Thomas' issues have been addressed.

Token:

Margaret Wasserman

Review

Brian Carpenter



2.2 Individual Submissions

         

2.2.1 New Item

     

Area

Date

SEC

Algorithms for Internet Key Exchange version 1 (IKEv1) (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 2

draft-hoffman-ikev1-algorithms-02.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Russ Housley

Review

Mary Barnes



SEC

Using CMS to Protect Firmware Packages (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 2

draft-housley-cms-fw-wrap-09.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Sam Hartman

Review

Scott Brim



2.2.2 Returning Item

     

Area

Date

APP

A UUID URN Namespace (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 1

draft-mealling-uuid-urn-04.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Ted Hardie

Review

Michael Patton



3. Document Actions

         

3.1 WG Submissions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable
contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If
not, what changes would make it so?"

         

3.1.1 New Item

     

Area

Date

SUB

Framework for GMPLS-based Control of SDH/SONET Networks (Informational) - 1 of 2

draft-ietf-ccamp-sdhsonet-control-04.txt

Note: Participant in PROTO Team pilot:
Workgroup Chair Followup of AD Evaluation Comments
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-proto-ad-comments-pilot-00.txt

Token:

Alex Zinin

Review

Elwyn Davies



GEN

IAB and IESG Recommendation for IETF Administrative Restructuring (Informational) - 2 of 2

draft-iab-iesg-adminrest-rec-00.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Harald Alvestrand

Review

Suzanne Davies



3.1.2 Returning Item
      NONE

3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable
contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If
not, what changes would make it so?"

         

3.2.1 New Item

     

Area

Date

APP

The 'tag' URI scheme (Informational) - 1 of 3

draft-kindberg-tag-uri-06.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Ted Hardie

Review

Joel Halpern



APP

The 'info' URI Scheme for Information Assets with Identifiers in Public Namespaces (Informational) - 2 of 3

draft-vandesompel-info-uri-02.txt [Open Web Ballot]

Token:

Ted Hardie

Review

Joel Halpern – Reviewed Earlier



APP

Synchronization operations for disconnected IMAP4 clients (Informational) - 3 of 3

draft-melnikov-imap-disc-06.txt

Token:

Ted Hardie

Review

John Loughney



3.2.2 Returning Item
      NONE

3.3 Individual Submissions Via RFC Editor

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Does this document
represent an end run around the IETF's working groups
or its procedures? Does this document present an incompatible
change to IETF technologies as if it were compatible?" Other
matters may be sent to the RFC Editor in private review.

         

3.3.1 New Item
      NONE
3.3.2 Returning Item
      NONE