Updated 2:26:12 EDT, October 22,
2004
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet
infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"
|
2.1 WG Submissions |
||||||||
|
2.1.1 New Item |
||||||||
|
Area |
Date |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APP |
MIME-based Secure Peer-to-Peer Business Data Interchange over the Internet Using HTTP (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 11 |
||||||||
Token: |
|||||||||
Review |
John Loughney |
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
SUB |
Use of PE-PE GRE or IP in BGP/MPLS IP VPNs (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 11 |
||||||||
Note: 2004-10-21: Ready for IESG review. |
|||||||||
Token: |
|||||||||
Review |
Lucy Lynch |
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
OPS |
Oct 21 |
Diameter Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP) Application (Proposed Standard) - 3 of 11 |
|||||||
Token: |
|||||||||
Review |
Mark Allman |
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
SUB |
Oct 20 |
Link Management Protocol Management Information Base (Proposed Standard) - 4 of 11 |
|||||||
Token: |
|||||||||
Review |
Mary Barnes |
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
TSV |
Update to the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Preconditions Framework (Proposed Standard) - 5 of 11 |
||||||||
Token: |
|||||||||
Review |
Spencer Dawkins |
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
RTG |
Source-Specific Multicast for IP (Proposed Standard) - 6 of 11 |
||||||||
Token: |
|||||||||
Review |
Brian Carpenter |
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
INT |
IP Tunnel MIB (Proposed Standard) - 7 of 11 |
||||||||
Token: |
|||||||||
Review |
Joel Halpern |
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
INT |
Management Information Base for the User Datagram Protocol (UDP) (Proposed Standard) - 8 of 11 |
||||||||
Token: |
|||||||||
Review |
John Loughney |
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
INT |
Experimental Message, Extension and Error Codes for Mobile IPv4 (Proposed Standard) - 9 of 11 |
||||||||
draft-ietf-mip4-experimental-messages-02.txt [Open Web Ballot] |
|||||||||
Note: 2004-10-21: ready for IESG review. |
|||||||||
Token: |
|||||||||
Review |
Lucy Lynch |
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
SEC |
The Use of Galois/Counter Mode (GCM) in IPsec ESP (Proposed Standard) - 10 of 11 |
||||||||
Token: |
|||||||||
Review |
Mary Barnes |
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
INT |
Rapid Commit Option for DHCPv4 (Proposed Standard) - 11 of 11 |
||||||||
Token: |
|||||||||
Review |
Spencer Dawkins |
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
2.1.2 Returning Item |
|||||||||
2.2 Individual Submissions |
|||||||||
|
2.2.1 New Item |
||||||||
|
Area |
Date |
|||||||
APP |
Internationalized Resource Identifiers (IRIs) (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 3 |
||||||||
Token: |
|||||||||
Review |
Brian Carpenter |
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
OPS |
Oct 21 |
Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) Scheme for the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 3 |
|||||||
Note: IESG, please make sure to review revision 8! |
|||||||||
Token: |
|||||||||
Review |
Joel Halpern |
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
OPS |
Terminology for Describing Internet Connectivivy (BCP) - 3 of 3 |
||||||||
Token: |
|||||||||
Review |
John Loughney |
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
2.2.2 Returning Item |
|||||||||
|
3.1 WG SubmissionsReviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable |
||||||||||||||||
|
3.1.1 New Item |
||||||||||||||||
|
Area |
Date |
|||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RTG |
Requirements for Generalized MPLS (GMPLS) Routing for Automatically Switched Optical Network (ASON) (Informational) - 1 of 5 |
||||||||||||||||
draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-ason-routing-reqts-05.txt [Open Web Ballot] |
|||||||||||||||||
Token: |
|||||||||||||||||
Review |
Michael Patton |
||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
RTG |
Requirements for Generalized MPLS (GMPLS) Signaling Usage and Extensions for Automatically Switched Optical Network (ASON) (Informational) - 2 of 5 |
||||||||||||||||
Token: |
|||||||||||||||||
Review |
Lucy Lynch |
||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
TSV |
Transcoding Services Invocation in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Using Third Party Call Control (3pcc) (Informational) - 3 of 5 |
||||||||||||||||
Token: |
|||||||||||||||||
Review |
Mary Barnes |
||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
APP |
A Presence Architecture for the Distribution of GEOPRIV Location Objects (Informational) - 4 of 5 |
||||||||||||||||
Token: |
|||||||||||||||||
Review |
Spencer Dawkins |
||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
OPS |
IPv6 Host Configuration of DNS Server Information Approaches (Informational) - 5 of 5 |
||||||||||||||||
draft-ietf-dnsop-ipv6-dns-configuration-04.txt [Open Web Ballot] |
|||||||||||||||||
Token: |
|||||||||||||||||
Review |
Brian Carpenter |
||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
3.1.2 Returning Item |
|||||||||||||||||
|
Area |
Date |
|||||||||||||||
INT |
Extensions to support efficient carrying of multicast traffic in Layer-2 Tunneling Protocol (L2TP) (Experimental) - 1 of 1 |
||||||||||||||||
Note: 2004-10-12: -05 is out; ready for IESG review. |
|||||||||||||||||
Token: |
|||||||||||||||||
Review |
Brian Carpenter |
||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
3.2 Individual Submissions Via ADReviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable |
|||||||||||||||||
|
3.2.1 New Item |
||||||||||||||||
|
Area |
Date |
|||||||||||||||
GEN |
RFC 1888 is obsolete (Informational) - 1 of 3 |
||||||||||||||||
Token: |
|||||||||||||||||
Review |
Joel Halpern |
||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
GEN |
BinaryTime: An alternate format for representing date and time in ASN.1 (Experimental) - 2 of 3 |
||||||||||||||||
Token: |
|||||||||||||||||
Review |
John Loughney |
||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
OPS |
Threats relating to IPv6 multihoming solutions (Informational) - 3 of 3 |
||||||||||||||||
Token: |
|||||||||||||||||
Review |
Lucy Lynch |
||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
3.2.2 Returning Item |
|||||||||||||||||
|
Area |
Date |
|||||||||||||||
GEN |
Calendar Access Protocol (CAP) (Experimental) - 1 of 1 |
||||||||||||||||
Note: This document is the successor to the draft-calsch-cap-13. As part of the closure of the CALSCH working group, the chairs, author, and I agreed that it should go forward as experimental to document the point the group reached. |
|||||||||||||||||
Token: |
|||||||||||||||||
Review |
Joel Halpern |
||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
3.3 Individual Submissions Via RFC EditorReviews should focus on these questions: "Does this document |
|||||||||||||||||
|
3.3.1 New Item |
||||||||||||||||